Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of ongoing conflicts: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 09:08, 24 May 2008 editArtene50 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,147 edits →List of ongoing conflicts ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:10, 24 May 2008 edit undoArtene50 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,147 edits →List of ongoing conflicts Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*'''Keep''', seems to be ]. Saying an article is unstable because it documents something that changes would invalided every biography of any living person, for starters. This is not a portal, it is a list that complies with ] in that it presents more information than a category could. This is also not news, as it does not document brief events of limited importance, but points to fully encyclopedic articles that are and will continue to be updated. Finally, it is a subarticle linked to by ]. I don't see a real rationale for deletion under any guideline here. --] \| ] 06:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		*'''Keep''', seems to be ]. Saying an article is unstable because it documents something that changes would invalided every biography of any living person, for starters. This is not a portal, it is a list that complies with ] in that it presents more information than a category could. This is also not news, as it does not document brief events of limited importance, but points to fully encyclopedic articles that are and will continue to be updated. Finally, it is a subarticle linked to by ]. I don't see a real rationale for deletion under any guideline here. --] \| ] 06:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
	*'''Strong keep''' there are <span class="plainlinks"></span> pages linking to this article. The article contains references and is an informative encyclopaedic article. I also think ] is very right about this being an unfair nomination (]) ——] \| ] • ] 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		*'''Strong keep''' there are <span class="plainlinks"></span> pages linking to this article. The article contains references and is an informative encyclopaedic article. I also think ] is very right about this being an unfair nomination (]) ——] \| ] • ] 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
	* '''Keep''', The article is relevant as a guide for the violent and unpredictable world we live in. And Misplaced Pages is a dictionary that is supposed to document this topic. The people who live in ~~Darfur~~, Colombia, ~~ASri~~ Lanka, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine/Israel would quickly know the importance of this 'list' in their daily lives. ] (]) 09:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		* '''Keep''', The article is relevant as a guide for the violent and unpredictable world we live in. And Misplaced Pages is a dictionary that is supposed to document this important topic. We don't live in a world where every country is at peace. The people who live in Sudan, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine/Israel would quickly know the importance of this 'list' in their daily lives. ] (]) 09:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:10, 24 May 2008

List of ongoing conflicts

I don't see how this can be an article on Misplaced Pages. Its unstable and will NEVER be a stable article. Everything added to this article will eventually get removed. This is really just Current events. Im not sure but I believe everything on Misplaced Pages has to be in past tense, since its presenting things as history. This is suitable for Wikinews, but not as a article in a encyclopedia. Again theres no way this will ever be stable. Theres List of wars which does it the correct way. Coasttocoast (talk) 04:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep, seems to be WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Saying an article is unstable because it documents something that changes would invalided every biography of any living person, for starters. This is not a portal, it is a list that complies with WP:CLS in that it presents more information than a category could. This is also not news, as it does not document brief events of limited importance, but points to fully encyclopedic articles that are and will continue to be updated. Finally, it is a subarticle linked to by List of wars. I don't see a real rationale for deletion under any guideline here. --Dhartung | Talk 06:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Strong keep there are quite a few pages linking to this article. The article contains references and is an informative encyclopaedic article. I also think Dhartung is very right about this being an unfair nomination (WP:IDONTLIKEIT) ——Ryan | t • c 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Keep, The article is relevant as a guide for the violent and unpredictable world we live in. And Misplaced Pages is a dictionary that is supposed to document this important topic. We don't live in a world where every country is at peace. The people who live in Sudan, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine/Israel would quickly know the importance of this 'list' in their daily lives. Artene50 (talk) 09:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Categories:

Revision as of 09:08, 24 May 2008 editArtene50 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,147 edits →List of ongoing conflicts ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:10, 24 May 2008 edit undoArtene50 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,147 edits →List of ongoing conflicts Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*'''Keep''', seems to be ]. Saying an article is unstable because it documents something that changes would invalided every biography of any living person, for starters. This is not a portal, it is a list that complies with ] in that it presents more information than a category could. This is also not news, as it does not document brief events of limited importance, but points to fully encyclopedic articles that are and will continue to be updated. Finally, it is a subarticle linked to by ]. I don't see a real rationale for deletion under any guideline here. --] \| ] 06:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		*'''Keep''', seems to be ]. Saying an article is unstable because it documents something that changes would invalided every biography of any living person, for starters. This is not a portal, it is a list that complies with ] in that it presents more information than a category could. This is also not news, as it does not document brief events of limited importance, but points to fully encyclopedic articles that are and will continue to be updated. Finally, it is a subarticle linked to by ]. I don't see a real rationale for deletion under any guideline here. --] \| ] 06:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
	*'''Strong keep''' there are <span class="plainlinks"></span> pages linking to this article. The article contains references and is an informative encyclopaedic article. I also think ] is very right about this being an unfair nomination (]) ——] \| ] • ] 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		*'''Strong keep''' there are <span class="plainlinks"></span> pages linking to this article. The article contains references and is an informative encyclopaedic article. I also think ] is very right about this being an unfair nomination (]) ——] \| ] • ] 07:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
	* '''Keep''', The article is relevant as a guide for the violent and unpredictable world we live in. And Misplaced Pages is a dictionary that is supposed to document this topic. The people who live in ~~Darfur~~, Colombia, ~~ASri~~ Lanka, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine/Israel would quickly know the importance of this 'list' in their daily lives. ] (]) 09:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)		* '''Keep''', The article is relevant as a guide for the violent and unpredictable world we live in. And Misplaced Pages is a dictionary that is supposed to document this important topic. We don't live in a world where every country is at peace. The people who live in Sudan, Colombia, Sri Lanka, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine/Israel would quickly know the importance of this 'list' in their daily lives. ] (]) 09:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)