| Revision as of 17:27, 25 May 2008 editKendrick7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,315 edits interesting point though← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:18, 25 May 2008 edit undo207.112.69.210 (talk) libel is awesomeNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :That's an interesting point, but if we started applying ] to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :That's an interesting point, but if we started applying ] to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Irrelevant. ] requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal. | |||
Revision as of 22:18, 25 May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, you will be blocked from editing. Ashton1983 (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting point, but if we started applying WP:BLP to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- Kendrick7 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.