| Revision as of 22:18, 25 May 2008 edit207.112.69.210 (talk) libel is awesome← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:03, 25 May 2008 edit undoDtobias (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers12,883 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :That's an interesting point, but if we started applying ] to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | :That's an interesting point, but if we started applying ] to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Irrelevant. ] requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal. | ::Irrelevant. ] requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal. | ||
| :::You're trying to make a ], aren't you? I'm not positive ''what'' point, but you seem to be making one. ] (]) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 25 May 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV/Evidence, you will be blocked from editing. Ashton1983 (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- That's an interesting point, but if we started applying WP:BLP to the free discussion of editor's behavior, we'd get nothing else done. -- Kendrick7 17:27, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.
- You're trying to make a WP:POINT, aren't you? I'm not positive what point, but you seem to be making one. *Dan T.* (talk) 23:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Irrelevant. WP:BLP requires me to remove violations. No conflicting policy forbids same, or to respect the wishes of users who think libel is no big deal.