| Revision as of 22:45, 21 August 2005 editEleemosynary (talk | contribs)4,174 edits →No Problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:49, 21 August 2005 edit undoToshiba (talk | contribs)98 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ===No Problem=== | ===No Problem=== | ||
| No problem, just one more thing, usually it's customary to add 4 tildes like this,<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of a comment, so people know who wrote it without having to go to the history. Somebody should have said this when you first started, but the ] isn't able to get everybody. ] 22:10, 21 August 2005 (UTC) | No problem, just one more thing, usually it's customary to add 4 tildes like this,<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of a comment, so people know who wrote it without having to go to the history. Somebody should have said this when you first started, but the ] isn't able to get everybody. ] 22:10, 21 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Leaving aside the question of how you know that an anonymous user is a banned user, there is clearly no vandalism going on. Asserting that Cindy Sheehan is a Democrat cannot be said to be vandalism. It's not in dispute presumably, the only question between you and the anonymous "vandal" being its prominence. It's not about vandalism but a disagreement. I agree with you by the way, it's not something that's needed in the first sentence of the article but you don't have the right to break the 3RR nor leave misleading edit summaries by calling it vandalism. It isn't. You know what happened to the boy who cried "Wolf!" ] 22:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 21 August 2005
Cindy Sheehan
Nice edits on Cindy Sheehan article. Badagnani 08:43, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Cindy Sheehan Technical Issue
Sorry for the comp problems on my end, I was just adding more anti-war mom comments, not vandalizing your work, which has been great. Just wanted to check in with that to avoid any confusion. Karmafist 23:27, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Cindy Sheehan
Don't revert any more of 4.228.90.146 edits to the summary; he'll be blocked shortly for 3RR violation and, in several hours, your can restore the summary. (That way you'll avoid 3RR yourself) Soltak 00:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Congrats
You definately deserve it, that article is great, and you've put in alot of work into it. For more info on Barnstars, the awards given to Wikipedians who do great things, check out WP:STAR.
Also, your user page is your own, unless you want it there, Keetoowah's comment can be removed immediately. His behavior has been atrocious, he currently has a request for comment out on him, i'll report his rude behavior to you there and to Zoe, an admin who's been checking on him. Karmafist 21:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
No Problem
No problem, just one more thing, usually it's customary to add 4 tildes like this,~~~~ at the end of a comment, so people know who wrote it without having to go to the history. Somebody should have said this when you first started, but the Welcoming Committee isn't able to get everybody. Karmafist 22:10, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Leaving aside the question of how you know that an anonymous user is a banned user, there is clearly no vandalism going on. Asserting that Cindy Sheehan is a Democrat cannot be said to be vandalism. It's not in dispute presumably, the only question between you and the anonymous "vandal" being its prominence. It's not about vandalism but a disagreement. I agree with you by the way, it's not something that's needed in the first sentence of the article but you don't have the right to break the 3RR nor leave misleading edit summaries by calling it vandalism. It isn't. You know what happened to the boy who cried "Wolf!" Toshiba 22:49, 21 August 2005 (UTC)