| Revision as of 22:37, 21 August 2005 editDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →Royal urban legends← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:45, 22 August 2005 edit undoGavin the Chosen (talk | contribs)664 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Otherwise please add new comments below. | Otherwise please add new comments below. | ||
| ==Notice== | |||
| This user, dreamGuy is under arbitration. Please see the RFAr page to learn more | |||
| ==New discussion== | ==New discussion== | ||
Revision as of 15:45, 22 August 2005
I periodically go through and clean out the old comments... This is because they refer to old situations or that the comments are otherwise no longer relevant.
Note: If you are here to leave personal attacks, false accusations of vandalism, a long tirade about why your cat photo or article about yourself should be left alone as you and only you wanted, nonsensical rationalizations of why vampires, ancient astronauts, werewolves, "creation science" and so on should be treated as completely real and so forth, do not bother, as I'll either just remove them right away or simply point you to the appropriate Misplaced Pages policy which you should have read in the first place.
Otherwise please add new comments below.
Notice
This user, dreamGuy is under arbitration. Please see the RFAr page to learn more
New discussion
Red hair
Hi Dream Guy, I deleted your caption to the red hair image (about it being dyed). I went to the source of the image and it doesn't say anything about being dyed. When I first saw the image several months ago on Misplaced Pages it was labeled "dyed" but I don't know where that came from. The model has the exact same hair color, skin tone and eye color that I have and mine is natural. So I know it is possibly natural. Well, regardless if the the image stays or not I just wanted to straighten that out. CDA 19:51, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
- I restored the caption. We already discussed this on the talk page. DreamGuy 19:54, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
Royal urban legends
You wanted one link and he wanted the other, so I inserted both. The articles do seem to have different content, and a see also isn't worth edit-warring over. SlimVirgin 22:34, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
- You are just encouraging him in making a fork section instead of working on the main article. I just put a merge notice in, but I expect it will probably go uncommented upon as the conversation I tried to start up there weeks back went unreplied to. DreamGuy 22:37, August 21, 2005 (UTC)