Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sasquatch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:06, 31 May 2008 edit64.107.219.187 (talk) thanx for nice unjust block, so nice← Previous edit Revision as of 20:07, 31 May 2008 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by 64.107.219.187 - "thanx for nice unjust block, so nice"Next edit →
Line 53: Line 53:
provocation http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:68.144.163.60&diff=prev&oldid=215804118 provocation http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:68.144.163.60&diff=prev&oldid=215804118
: http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pharos#Edit_Feud_Problem : http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pharos#Edit_Feud_Problem
: Is this wrong, do you just look at a person i am protecting, just because of that or some ranting i deserve to be blocked, you could have at least reverted privacy violation then block me, shame on you forever, this certainly will be remembered pal...so nice of you, thank you! : Is this wrong, do you just look at a person i am protecting, just because of that or some ranting i deserve to be blocked, you could have at least reverted privacy violation then block me, shame on you forever, this certainly will be remembered pal...so nice of you, thank you! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 20:07, 31 May 2008

Archives: α β γ δ ε ζ η θ

This user is a
Cabal of One.

Anyone up for chess?

nd
abcdefgh
8a8 black bishopb8 black queenc8 black kingf8 black rookg8 black pawnc7 black bishopd7 black pawne7 black pawnf7 black pawnh7 black pawnd6 black knighta5 black pawnb5 black pawnd4 white knightg4 white bishoph4 white pawna3 white knightg3 white pawna2 white pawnb2 white pawnc2 white queend2 white pawne2 white pawnf2 white pawng2 white rookc1 white kingd1 white bishopf1 white rookg1 3 08
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh

Sasquatch v. World (Sasquatch to move) 1.e4 c5 2. Nc3 e6 3. b3 d5 4. exd5 exd5 5. Qe2+ Be7 6. Ba3 b6 7. Nf4 Nf6


2008 Sichuan Earthquake

Mate I'm not trying to make a political statement, I'm just trying remain neutral. The page previous to edit was far from neutral. Taiwan's status is "staus quo." Not an independent nation nor part of China. Is that alright?Jackchen123 (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I was not aware of this policy. Whilst I do not agree with it I will accept it, and will revert my changes (if not already done so.) Thank you for your advice. Jackchen123 (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


RE:7.8or7.9?

Here is the offical website of Chinese Seismology Bureaus "2008-05-12 14:28:04.1 30.95 103.40 33 Ms7.8 四川汶川县 " This webpage is the auto-release seismology information page ,therefore the page only conserve in 7days (= =)--Prinz.W (talk) 04:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Messages

Hello, Sasquatch. You have new messages at CWii's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello there.

I heard that you are a nice man. Would you be interested in mentoring an autistic user that likes to write articles? Thanks, JeanLatore (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The FA-Team

Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 18:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for suspending me, I appreciate it

You said blocked users to email you, duh, i cant even create email, since you people blocked that option.

Did you read administrators board, did you read provocation http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:68.144.163.60&diff=prev&oldid=215804118

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pharos#Edit_Feud_Problem
Is this wrong, do you just look at a person i am protecting, just because of that or some ranting i deserve to be blocked, you could have at least reverted privacy violation then block me, shame on you forever, this certainly will be remembered pal...so nice of you, thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.219.187 (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)