| Revision as of 17:12, 24 August 2005 editEncyclopedist (talk | contribs)9,098 editsm →I don't think [] is an admin← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:14, 24 August 2005 edit undoDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →Are you alright?Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Congratulations again on reaching 4,000 edits. I am glad we could finally stop bickering...yet I am very disappointed that arguments between you and other WikiMembers continue. Please let's all get along. ] Take care, ] ] ] 17:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | Congratulations again on reaching 4,000 edits. I am glad we could finally stop bickering...yet I am very disappointed that arguments between you and other WikiMembers continue. Please let's all get along. ] Take care, ] ] ] 17:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Yes, I am disappointed that other editors (especially that one you know and a rogue admin) are still arguing with me, but then since they both follow me around, start conflicts and break policies, not much I can do about it at this point. ] 17:14, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:14, 24 August 2005
I periodically go through and clean out the old comments... This is because they refer to old situations or that the comments are otherwise no longer relevant. Those looking for archives are invited to refer to the history.
Note: If you are here to leave personal attacks, false accusations of vandalism, a long tirade about why your cat photo or article about yourself should be left alone as you and only you wanted, nonsensical rationalizations of why vampires, ancient astronauts, werewolves, "creation science" and so on should be treated as completely real and so forth, do not bother, as I'll either just remove them right away or simply point you to the appropriate Misplaced Pages policy which you should have read in the first place.
Otherwise please add new comments below.
New discussion
I don't think User:SqueakBox is an admin
FYI Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/SqueakBox (unless there has been a more recent one) suggest he isn't as you seem to be under the impression (given comments etc.) that he is. Tooddle Pip --ElvisThePrince 23:34, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- I suppose I should leave that here so I don't keep getting more people telling me he isn't as I clean out the page. And from his actions I think it's a good thing that he isn't. DreamGuy 23:42, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
- No Argument here--ElvisThePrince 23:46, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Are you alright?
Congratulations again on reaching 4,000 edits. I am glad we could finally stop bickering...yet I am very disappointed that arguments between you and other WikiMembers continue. Please let's all get along. 
Take care, D. J. Bracey (talk) 
17:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I am disappointed that other editors (especially that one you know and a rogue admin) are still arguing with me, but then since they both follow me around, start conflicts and break policies, not much I can do about it at this point. DreamGuy 17:14, August 24, 2005 (UTC)