Misplaced Pages

Talk:Big Brother (British TV series) series 9: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:54, 6 June 2008 editGuinness2702 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,727 edits Mario in Brits Behind Bars.← Previous edit Revision as of 14:54, 6 June 2008 edit undoBerks911 (talk | contribs)131 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{notaforum|anything not directly related to improving the ] about this series of Big Brother}} {{notaforum|anything not directly related to improving the ] about this series of Big Brother}}
{{Big Brother project|small=no|importance=High|class=Start}} {{Big Brother project|small=no|importance=mid|class=Start}}
{{ArticleHistory {{ArticleHistory
|action1=AFD |action1=AFD

Revision as of 14:54, 6 June 2008

This page is not a forum for general discussion about anything not directly related to improving the encyclopedia article about this series of Big Brother. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about anything not directly related to improving the encyclopedia article about this series of Big Brother at the Reference desk.
WikiProject iconBig Brother Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThe Big Brother WikiProject aims to improve articles relating to Big Brother, and Big Brother (British TV series) series 9 has been identified as one of these articles. Anybody can help the WikiProject by trying to improve existing articles. Please add your name to the list of participants, if you are committed to helping out.Big BrotherWikipedia:WikiProject Big BrotherTemplate:WikiProject Big BrotherBig Brother
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2007Articles for deletionDeleted
January 16, 2008Articles for deletionKept
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Big Brother (British TV series) series 9 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 7 days 
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This page is automatically archived. Any sections without comment in at least 7 days will be moved to the archive.

The Article move not needed.

The article move was not needed. WP:BIGBRO has clear guidelines that the UK edition should follow the style of Big Brother 200x (UK) not Big Brother x (UK). The article should have not been moved without discussion and now is weird for the previous articles to follow the pattern while this article follows the pattern of the US naming scheme. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

And for discussion purposes one of the reasons the UK follows the naming scheme it does (if I remember right) mainly due to the celebrity edition. Channel 4's BB Archives calls CBB 2005 Celebrity Big Brother 5 despite it being third overall. The same was brought up with the 2007 series, the C4 archives, again, say the 2007 edition was the seventh CBB edition despite it being fifth overall. The UK uses years for its articles to avoid confusion. That was a big key point last time I believe. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:41, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

House pics

Should we add that house pictures have been leaked today???89.100.221.196 (talk) 18:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)E-To-The-Izzo

  • Personally, my vote is yes, because it's relevant considering it's not a rumour, it's evidence that the previous stories about the house have been true. I think it should be added. Sky83 (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I've added in a description of the main features of the house, that will be enough until the the series launch.

Vandalism

Can someone semi-protect the article or something for now? Thanks Exxy (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Some of it has been restored, but it is missing a lot of real content that was added.Trious (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Can someone just fill out the housemate details from the profiles here http://www.channel4.com/bigbrother/housemates/ and lock it for tonight. There'll be lots more in tomorrows papers --Tshannon0 (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Big Brother 2008 (UK) unnecessary

Now that the article is semi-protected and the show has actually started, wouldn't it just be simpler and more effective to put Big Brother housemates back as the regular template? Geoking66talk 21:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Template:Big Brother 2008 (UK) should be deleted as it is not needed. It is just a copy of Template:Big Brother housemates except it is set up to only be used with this series. I propose delete and use the regular template just like every other Big Brother article does. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 21:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Nominated Template:Big Brother 2008 (UK) for deletion. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Failed to apply?

"a round up of the previous day's events will be read by mock news reader 'Dai Davis Peach', who failed to apply for the seventh and eighth season of Big Brother."

Is this sentence correct? Perhaps it's supposed to mean "whose application for failed" rather than "failed to apply"? Evercat (talk) 00:33, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Mario in Brits Behind Bars.

Gotta say, the youtube video here looks a lot like Mario. I've read in quite a few places that he was in Brits Behind Bars, so I dunno if someone maybe wants to add this in? Exxy (talk) 12:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • I think that there are many reasons not to include this, and none to include it at this time. If you can find some reliable source which specifically says it's him, then maybe this information can be included (i.e. where exactly have you read this?). Guinness (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Categories: