Misplaced Pages

User talk:Checkspake: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:06, 15 April 2008 editChicken Wing (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,520 editsm Red links: spaces← Previous edit Revision as of 15:22, 6 June 2008 edit undo79.84.240.18 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 84: Line 84:


:I noticed this too. And why do we need another stupid category?--] (]) 13:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC) :I noticed this too. And why do we need another stupid category?--] (]) 13:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

==Ann Scott in the LGTB models category==
I took the liberty of removing this category you added on ex model Ann Scott's page because this category contains too few proper fashion models. It's more about transexuals or playboy bunnies, and somehow I don't see how Ann Scott fits in there. Also we don't know if she was bisexual at the time she was a model. There's no source for that, so I suggest you find a source if you want to put it back. Also if I may, I think this category should be renamed "LGTB fashion models" and only include fashion models. Don't you think ?

Revision as of 15:22, 6 June 2008

Welcome

Hello, Checkspake! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 14:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Notability of Joseph Mawle

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Joseph Mawle, by another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Joseph Mawle seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Joseph Mawle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 15:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Notability

A tag has been placed on Interlock (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BURNyA 15:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


Red links

Why are you adding red links to a bunch of articles? There is currently no category for "bisexual models". Chicken Wing (talk) 11:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop adding red links to the category sections of biographies. Chicken Wing (talk) 13:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I noticed this too. And why do we need another stupid category?--Knulclunk (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Ann Scott in the LGTB models category

I took the liberty of removing this category you added on ex model Ann Scott's page because this category contains too few proper fashion models. It's more about transexuals or playboy bunnies, and somehow I don't see how Ann Scott fits in there. Also we don't know if she was bisexual at the time she was a model. There's no source for that, so I suggest you find a source if you want to put it back. Also if I may, I think this category should be renamed "LGTB fashion models" and only include fashion models. Don't you think ?