| Revision as of 20:05, 8 June 2008 editMickMacNee (talk | contribs)23,386 edits →"Incivil": sign problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:07, 8 June 2008 edit undoKelly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,890 edits only doing this to be fair to parties on all sidesNext edit → | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| FYI, per the ], if enough people in the world use this word (especially in reputeable places like en.wikipedia), it can become an officially recognised word. ] (]) 20:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | FYI, per the ], if enough people in the world use this word (especially in reputeable places like en.wikipedia), it can become an officially recognised word. ] (]) 20:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==] == | |||
| As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if logged ]. | |||
| ] <sup>]</sup> 20:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:07, 8 June 2008
| War on Bad Writing 1. There is no such word as "incivil." You can be uncivil, and you can be accused of incivility, but you cannot be incivil. 2. There is definitely no such word as "definately." |
 | |||
|
|
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
Why local?
Hi SlimVirgin,
I see you restored Image:Zigong People's Park Zoo.jpg, saying we should keep a local copy. I'm trying to wrap my mind around the various Misplaced Pages image issues and this was a new one to me. Would you mind enlightening me on the advantages of having a local copy of an image that exists on Commons?--Kubigula (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- That makes sense - thanks. Though I sometimes work the on-Commons backlog, I'm skeptical of the real benefit of those deletions. If the deleted local version is still available on the server, we can't be saving much space or processing power.--Kubigula (talk) 04:52, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you., I am sorry if this is a repost, Chafford (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
VP
don't you mean VS? :) ViperSnake151 16:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
"Incivil"
FYI, per the English language, if enough people in the world use this word (especially in reputeable places like en.wikipedia), it can become an officially recognised word. MickMacNee (talk) 20:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles
As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if logged here.