| Revision as of 06:38, 19 January 2004 editSam Spade (talk | contribs)33,916 edits change of reference from israeli politics to international zionism← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:39, 19 January 2004 edit undoSam Spade (talk | contribs)33,916 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ==Symbolism of the Amalekites== | ==Symbolism of the Amalekites== | ||
| In ]ish tradition, the Amalekites came represent the archetypal enemy of the Jews. For example, ], from the ], is called the Agagite, which is interpretted as being a descendant of the Amalekite king ]. The term has been used metaphorically to refer to enemies of Judaism throughout history, including the ]s, and controversially, among some fringe groups on the far ] ] movement to refer to the ], though this is said by many not to be an identification of either the Nazis or Palestinians with the biblical Amalek. The concept has long been used by ] (particularly the ]) to represent the rejection of God, or ]. Of the ] ] (commandments) followed by ]s, three refer to the Amalekites: to remember what the Amalekites did to the Jews, to not forget what the Amalekites did to the Jews, and to destroy the Amalekites utterly. The rabbis derived these from Deut. 25:17-18, Exodus 17:14 and 1 Sam. 15:3. ] explains the third mitzvah: ''From man unto woman, from infant unto suckling, from ox unto sheep, so that the name of Amalek not be mentioned even with reference to an animal by saying "This animal belonged to Amalek".'' | In ]ish tradition, the Amalekites came represent the archetypal enemy of the Jews. For example, ], from the ], is called the Agagite, which is interpretted as being a descendant of the Amalekite king ]. The term has been used metaphorically to refer to enemies of Judaism throughout history, including the ]s, and controversially, among some fringe groups on the far ] of the ] movement to refer to the ], though this is said by many not to be an identification of either the Nazis or Palestinians with the biblical Amalek. The concept has long been used by ] (particularly the ]) to represent the rejection of God, or ]. Of the ] ] (commandments) followed by ]s, three refer to the Amalekites: to remember what the Amalekites did to the Jews, to not forget what the Amalekites did to the Jews, and to destroy the Amalekites utterly. The rabbis derived these from Deut. 25:17-18, Exodus 17:14 and 1 Sam. 15:3. ] explains the third mitzvah: ''From man unto woman, from infant unto suckling, from ox unto sheep, so that the name of Amalek not be mentioned even with reference to an animal by saying "This animal belonged to Amalek".'' | ||
| ==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 06:39, 19 January 2004
According to the Bible, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz and the grandson of Esau (Gen. 36:12; 1 Chr. 1:36); the chief of an Idumean tribe (Gen. 36:16). His mother was a Horite, a tribe whose territory the descendants of Esau had seized. The genealogy of Amalek, if it may be read as traditional ethnology rather than literally, relates the Amalekites to the Edomites (consequently also to the Hebrews). This can be concluded from the genealogy in (Genesis xxxvi. 12; I Chron. i. 36) Amalek is a son of Esau's son Eliphaz and of the concubine Timna, a [[Horite[[ and sister of Lotan. 'Timnah' appears as the name of an Edomite clan-chief in Genesis xxxvi, 4. Amalek, for what ever reason, has become eponymous for the Amelekites.
Amelekites
In the Pentateuch, the Amelekites are nomads who attacked the Hebrews at Rephidim in the desert of Sinai during their exodus from Egypt: "smiting the hindmost, all that were feeble behind," (I Samuel xv. 2). The Tanakh recognizes the Amalekites as indigenous tribesmen, "the first of the nations" (Numbers xxiv. 20) In the southern lowlands too, perhaps the dry grazing lands that are now the Negev (Numbers xii, xiv), there were aboriginal Amalekites who were daunting adversaries of the Hebrews in the earliest times. "They dwelt in the land of the south...from Havilah until thou comest to Shur" (Num. 13:29; 1 Sam. 15:7). At times said to be allied with the Moabites (Judg. 3:13) and the Midianites (Judg. 6:3). Each of their kings bore the hereditary name of Agag (Num. 24:7; 1 Sam. 15:8). They also attacked the Israelites at Hormah (Num. 14:45). Saul defeated them utterly, but earned the wrath of God by sparing some for use as slaves, and failing to burn their treasures (1 Sam.).
Allies of the Amelekites
In 1 Samuel and Judges, the tribe of Kenites are associated with the Amalekites, sometimes their allies, sometimes allied with the tribes of Israel. The Amalek people are invariably enemies of Israel. Saul's successful expedition against the unidentified "city of Amalek," in the plain (I Samuel. xv.) resulted in the capture of the Amalekite king, Agag (the only Amalekite name that has been preserved).
Extermination of the Amelekites
As the Jewish Encyclopedia put it, "David waged a sacred war of extermination against the Amalekites," who subsequently disappeared from history. Long after, in the time of Hezekiah, five hundred Simeonites annihilated the last remnant "of the Amalekites that had escaped" on Mount Seir, and settled in their place.(1 Chronicles iv. 42-43)
The Amalekites existed as early as the time of Abraham in what would later be known as the Roman province of Arabia Petraea (Gen. 14:7). The Biblical relationship between the Hebrew and Amalekite tribes was one of unmitigated enmity. "Go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (1 Sam. 15:3). The Jews manner of dealing with them was extreme, as they could be shown no mercy. Women and children were slain, and no slaves or gold could be taken from them. Rather all were killed, and their valuables were burned. "He betook himself to slay the women and the children, and thought he did not act therein either barbarously or inhumanly; first, because they were enemies whom he thus treated, and, in the next place, because it was done by the command of God, whom it was dangerous not to obey." (Flavius Josephus Antiquities of the Jews Book VI, Chapter 7)
Symbolism of the Amalekites
In Jewish tradition, the Amalekites came represent the archetypal enemy of the Jews. For example, Haman, from the Book of Esther, is called the Agagite, which is interpretted as being a descendant of the Amalekite king Agag. The term has been used metaphorically to refer to enemies of Judaism throughout history, including the Nazis, and controversially, among some fringe groups on the far right wing of the Zionist movement to refer to the Arabs, though this is said by many not to be an identification of either the Nazis or Palestinians with the biblical Amalek. The concept has long been used by rabbis (particularly the Baal Shem Tov) to represent the rejection of God, or Atheism. Of the 613 mitzvot (commandments) followed by Orthodox Jews, three refer to the Amalekites: to remember what the Amalekites did to the Jews, to not forget what the Amalekites did to the Jews, and to destroy the Amalekites utterly. The rabbis derived these from Deut. 25:17-18, Exodus 17:14 and 1 Sam. 15:3. Rashi explains the third mitzvah: From man unto woman, from infant unto suckling, from ox unto sheep, so that the name of Amalek not be mentioned even with reference to an animal by saying "This animal belonged to Amalek".