| Revision as of 17:38, 12 June 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits rvv by 60.42.252.205 Groundless? I'm currently checking the Dutch resource that you delete. Besides, do not attach your insulting comment like "rubbish"← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:44, 12 June 2008 edit undo60.42.252.205 (talk) Undid revision 218896594 by Caspian blue (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| Let me think about it; I'm not Korean nor do I have a connection to the country, other than liking the food. Does that matter? ] (]) 15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | Let me think about it; I'm not Korean nor do I have a connection to the country, other than liking the food. Does that matter? ] (]) 15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == comfort women == | |||
| I am sorry. You are talking rubbish to label the edits as distruptive. They are fair and inline with the citations given on the page. | |||
| They all address the needs of the major tags placed on the article. --] (]) 17:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :And that was not a personal attack either ... | |||
| :Your summary is not true. If you read the article all the point contained in the first paragraph are reflected in the rest of the article. For example, it is a mater of fact that not all comfort women were involuntary, some were voluntary ... and so it goes on. | |||
| :Where a point is not disputed, and where there is such as significant indisputable quotation it is really not necessary to have duplicates. No one is challenging the point. | |||
| :My main effort is going to be to address the major tags at the top of the page and the poorly written copy. --] (]) 17:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Can I be honest, it appears to me that what you are trying to do is set me up for a complaint to an admin over some bogus charge to suit your own political agenda which appears to be Pro-Korean. | |||
| ::The charge that you are making is groundless. As state, I am mainly concerned with copyediting and putting this article into English. No one is disputing the facts. | |||
| ::~The tags at the top of the page are as clear as the fact not all comfort women were involuntary --- which is what you are removing without possibly being able to sustain it --] (]) 17:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion. | |||
| :::If you are patient, and wait to see what I am doing, then you will realise that I am not acting out nationalistic prejudices. --] (]) 17:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:44, 12 June 2008
Meatpuppet?
Bouncehoper: What the crap is a meatpuppet?
Baegis: A marionette that subsists on a diet solely of meat and its derivatives.
Bouncehoper: ...How is that different than a sockpuppet? (also, makes me hungry....)
Baegis: Sockpuppets, of course, eat cotton products, which are severely lacking in nutrition and deliciousness.
Bouncehoper: How....strange....lol. thanks!
from Baegis's talk page
You said I could e-mail you but you never gave me your e-mail there.--Chef Tanner (talk) 21:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- ah, I never realized that was there haha.--Chef Tanner (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
New name
Ah, the weather... as good a reason for changing names as any, I guess! I remember the summers in Korea-- I loved Fall and Spring, could tolerate Winter, but summer? Hot, muggy, sticky, sudden downpours... Nah... Here it only gets 113 degrees or so in the summer, but it's a dry heat... Dekkappai (talk) 00:22, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Korean cuisine template
Kinda tired and need to get up early tomorrow, i will look at it in the afternoon when I get home. I think it is a great concept, I think it just needs to have more working links though. We'll talk more about it tomorrow, oh and call me Chris, my last name is Tanner.Chef Tanner (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- I looked at it also, and it looks great! fix the links and I would take it live ASAP. --Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 08:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikiproject Korea/Popular culture + manhwa
Hola. I just figured out who you are...your earlier comment about changing your name had puzzled me. :) I came here after viewing the Zombie Hunter article history of edit wars over use of the word "manga". It was like deja-vu, ha ha. Anyway, what actually brought me here was that you'd tagged said article with a WP Korea/Popular culture working group template, and I'm hoping you'll take a moment to pop over to my user talk page and respond to some questions I have about manhwa articles in general. I'm inviting a couple other folks to the chat too, and want to centralize the discussion. Thanks so much!! --hamu♥hamu (talk) 12:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
invitation to join the Korea group
Let me think about it; I'm not Korean nor do I have a connection to the country, other than liking the food. Does that matter? Queenmomcat (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
comfort women
I am sorry. You are talking rubbish to label the edits as distruptive. They are fair and inline with the citations given on the page.
They all address the needs of the major tags placed on the article. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- And that was not a personal attack either ...
- Your summary is not true. If you read the article all the point contained in the first paragraph are reflected in the rest of the article. For example, it is a mater of fact that not all comfort women were involuntary, some were voluntary ... and so it goes on.
- Where a point is not disputed, and where there is such as significant indisputable quotation it is really not necessary to have duplicates. No one is challenging the point.
- My main effort is going to be to address the major tags at the top of the page and the poorly written copy. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Can I be honest, it appears to me that what you are trying to do is set me up for a complaint to an admin over some bogus charge to suit your own political agenda which appears to be Pro-Korean.
- The charge that you are making is groundless. As state, I am mainly concerned with copyediting and putting this article into English. No one is disputing the facts.
- ~The tags at the top of the page are as clear as the fact not all comfort women were involuntary --- which is what you are removing without possibly being able to sustain it --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion.
- If you are patient, and wait to see what I am doing, then you will realise that I am not acting out nationalistic prejudices. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)