| Revision as of 17:55, 12 June 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →3RR warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:10, 12 June 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →3RR warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --] (]) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --] (]) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| {{prettyquote|Can I be honest, it appears to me that what you are trying to do is set me up for a complaint to an admin over some bogus charge to suit your own political agenda which appears to be Pro-Korean.}} | |||
| :You're the one gaming the rule as attempting to look me bad as possible. I have not edited the article much because I don't care the issue that you care a lot, but noticed that your deleting compaign since yesterday. From a good faith, I checked your deleted soruces and then you keeps reverting and adding more unsuitable comment to engrage me. That is a gaming and per your comment, you seem to be far from new user. You're false accusing me of setting you up a bogus charge? What an horrendous personal attack and worst faith you're speading. Once your unsuitble comment is deleted from my talk page, you have no choice to regard my opinion. --] (]) 18:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:10, 12 June 2008
Comfort women
the summary was clear.
one was a dutch page not in english. see general policy on use of english reference. one was immediately above. NONE included the actual quotation in context to prove the point ... which I then added.
actually the one that I added a quote is perfectly suitable to prove the point (being the Judgment International Military Tribunal for the Far East. the purpose is to prove the point after all not.
thank you --60.42.252.205 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- You are indeed right. Very sorry. --Selket 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on Japanese war crimes by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Japanese war crimes, you will be blocked from editing. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Caspian blue. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages, as you did to Slavery in Japan, you will be blocked from editing. Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on User talk:Caspian blue. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.--Caspian blue (talk) 17:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
| “ | My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion. | ” |
You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --Caspian blue (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
| “ | Can I be honest, it appears to me that what you are trying to do is set me up for a complaint to an admin over some bogus charge to suit your own political agenda which appears to be Pro-Korean. | ” |
- You're the one gaming the rule as attempting to look me bad as possible. I have not edited the article much because I don't care the issue that you care a lot, but noticed that your deleting compaign since yesterday. From a good faith, I checked your deleted soruces and then you keeps reverting and adding more unsuitable comment to engrage me. That is a gaming and per your comment, you seem to be far from new user. You're false accusing me of setting you up a bogus charge? What an horrendous personal attack and worst faith you're speading. Once your unsuitble comment is deleted from my talk page, you have no choice to regard my opinion. --Caspian blue (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)