Misplaced Pages

User talk:60.42.252.205: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:10, 12 June 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits 3RR warning← Previous edit Revision as of 18:18, 12 June 2008 edit undo60.42.252.205 (talk) Brief comment re Caspian blueNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious ] page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.
== Comfort women ==


Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors ].
the summary was clear.


I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted ] or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later.
one was a dutch page not in english. see general policy on use of english reference. one was immediately above. NONE included the actual quotation in context to prove the point ... which I then added.


Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism.
actually the one that I added a quote is perfectly suitable to prove the point (being the Judgment International Military Tribunal for the Far East. the purpose is to prove the point after all not.


thank you --] (]) 17:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC) What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --] (]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

:You are indeed right. Very sorry. --''']''' <sup>]</sup> 17:04, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
::No, you're not right. The anon blanked yesterday on ] by his POV, and imporperly removed legitimate warnings.--] (]) 17:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

==June 2008==
] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Japanese war crimes|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->--] (]) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to ] other editors{{#if:User talk:Caspian blue|, as you did on ]}}. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa1 -->--] (]) 17:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Misplaced Pages{{#if:Slavery in Japan|, as you did to ]}}, you will be ] from editing. {{#if:Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.|Why are you keeping deleting contents here and there without any discussion? If you think the blanked information is misleading or should be taken out from the articles, please raise your concern at relevant talk pages. Besides, your definition of "irrelevance" seems to be very different from others.|}}<!-- Template:uw-delete3 -->--] (]) 17:26, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

==3RR warning==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:User talk:Caspian blue|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.|If you remove any comment of others or blank your talk page, that is totally fine. However, you keep reverting your inappropriate comments with uncivil tone on MY TALK PAGE, so I would not regard it as a good-faith discussion. If you want to express your concern on matters that you think is wrong, please use relevant talk pages first. I did not say that every comfort women were forced by Japanese military. Your blanking by your own POV does not help for building a consensus.|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--] (]) 17:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

{{prettyquote|My friend, the intentions behind your actions are utterly transparent to any English speaker, never mind any experienced wikipedian (e.g. attempting to set my up for a 3RR in response to your reversion.}}

You violate 3RR on my talk page regardless of the several warnings. I finished up the Dutch source that you delete, which correctly fits to the content. I only see your blatant intentions as you blanked out chunks of properly sourced materials. So, do not insult me any more with your reversion. --] (]) 17:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
{{prettyquote|Can I be honest, it appears to me that what you are trying to do is set me up for a complaint to an admin over some bogus charge to suit your own political agenda which appears to be Pro-Korean.}}

:You're the one gaming the rule as attempting to look me bad as possible. I have not edited the article much because I don't care the issue that you care a lot, but noticed that your deleting compaign since yesterday. From a good faith, I checked your deleted soruces and then you keeps reverting and adding more unsuitable comment to engrage me. That is a gaming and per your comment, you seem to be far from new user. You're false accusing me of setting you up a bogus charge? What an horrendous personal attack and worst faith you're speading. Once your unsuitble comment is deleted from my talk page, you have no choice to regard my opinion. --] (]) 18:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:18, 12 June 2008

I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.

Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors Caspian_blue.

I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later.

Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism.

What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)