| Revision as of 18:23, 12 June 2008 edit60.42.252.205 (talk) note re intimidation← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:51, 12 June 2008 edit undoJaysweet (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers8,707 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Comfort women. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --] (]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --] (]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == June 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Comfort women|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | |||
Revision as of 18:51, 12 June 2008
I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious Comfort Women page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions.
Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors Caspian_blue .
I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later .
Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism.
What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --60.42.252.205 (talk) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Comfort women. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jaysweet (talk) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.