| Revision as of 17:01, 14 June 2008 view sourceCanadian Monkey (talk | contribs)3,220 edits →Edit summaries← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:56, 15 June 2008 view source Elonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits →Edit summaries: - Please be careful about who you are referring to as a SPANext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::: Dkendr, it's not at all clear what you're talking about. Could you please provide links or ]? Thanks, ]]] 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | ::: Dkendr, it's not at all clear what you're talking about. Could you please provide links or ]? Thanks, ]]] 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Not clear?? Look up 8 lines - he's calling me a SPA. You've lost all credibility with me, Elonka. ] (]) 17:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | ::::Not clear?? Look up 8 lines - he's calling me a SPA. You've lost all credibility with me, Elonka. ] (]) 17:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::::: ChrisO, Canadian Monkey has a point, though he could express it better. But it is true that he has over a thousand edits on a variety of articles, of which ] isn't even in the top ten. He has definitely participated quite a bit at ], but why do you feel that justifies referring to him as a SPA? I see little resemblance between his editing, and someone like Tundrabuggy. --]]] 00:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:56, 15 June 2008
Old discussions now at /Archive 1 / /Archive 2 / /Archive 3 / /Archive 4 / /Archive 5 / /Archive 6 / /Archive 7 / /Archive 8 / /Archive 9 / /Archive 10 / /Archive 11 / /Archive 12 / /Archive 13 / /Archive 14 / /Archive 15 / /Archive 16 / /Archive 17 / /Archive 18 / /Archive 19 / /Archive 20 / /Archive 21
Please add new comments below.
Edit summaries
Please try to keep your edit summaries civil. Saying "loony conspiracy theories" was not. Also, what was this one about? He's not even editing the talkpage. --Elonka 05:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry - that should have been addressed to Canadian Monkey, not Tundrabuggy. It's hard to tell all these SPAs apart... -- ChrisO (talk) 07:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Who do we need to talk to in order to have your edit privileges revoked? You banned me for 24 hours for "personal attacks" and completely ignored all the personal attacks against me, and now you're attacking others. You are ill suited for the role of impartial referee. Dkendr (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dkendr, it's not at all clear what you're talking about. Could you please provide links or diffs? Thanks, Elonka 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not clear?? Look up 8 lines - he's calling me a SPA. You've lost all credibility with me, Elonka. Canadian Monkey (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- ChrisO, Canadian Monkey has a point, though he could express it better. But it is true that he has over a thousand edits on a variety of articles, of which Muhammad al-Durrah isn't even in the top ten. He has definitely participated quite a bit at Talk:Muhammad al-Durrah, but why do you feel that justifies referring to him as a SPA? I see little resemblance between his editing, and someone like Tundrabuggy. --Elonka 00:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not clear?? Look up 8 lines - he's calling me a SPA. You've lost all credibility with me, Elonka. Canadian Monkey (talk) 17:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dkendr, it's not at all clear what you're talking about. Could you please provide links or diffs? Thanks, Elonka 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Who do we need to talk to in order to have your edit privileges revoked? You banned me for 24 hours for "personal attacks" and completely ignored all the personal attacks against me, and now you're attacking others. You are ill suited for the role of impartial referee. Dkendr (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)