Misplaced Pages

User talk:Phlegm Rooster: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:44, 16 June 2008 editPhlegm Rooster (talk | contribs)6,413 edits Did you notice that I found (and fixed) a 42 kilometer error in the coordinates of the city of Mongo, Chad?← Previous edit Revision as of 15:15, 16 June 2008 edit undoEditorofthewiki (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers57,623 edits Am Dam: new sectionNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
The rationale for the proposed deletion of the ] article is invalid so I've removed it. If you feel the article lack synthesis because the "intelligence" referred to in the book title is meant in the espionage sense. You should have understood the article is not only Victor Marchetti's book. It reflect that the fact that the term "cult of intelligence" has been used in different contexts as well. --] (]) 18:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC) The rationale for the proposed deletion of the ] article is invalid so I've removed it. If you feel the article lack synthesis because the "intelligence" referred to in the book title is meant in the espionage sense. You should have understood the article is not only Victor Marchetti's book. It reflect that the fact that the term "cult of intelligence" has been used in different contexts as well. --] (]) 18:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
*When I search "cult of intelligence" -marchetti -cia -wikipedia I get . If I search for marchetti OR cia OR espionage AND "cult of intelligence" I get . *When I search "cult of intelligence" -marchetti -cia -wikipedia I get . If I search for marchetti OR cia OR espionage AND "cult of intelligence" I get .

== Am Dam ==

I remved the population figure mostly because it was irrelevant (the information should belong in the sub-prefecture's article, not the town's) while in the infobox it actually was misleading (it states that the population of the town was ~70,000 while it contradicted itself by saying the sub prefecture was that). While anyone with half a brain would probably understand what it meant, the population figure of the subprefecture should not be present nonetheless. Have I explained this well enough for you? I'm an ''''']]]]'''''<sup>]]</sup> 15:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:15, 16 June 2008

Naming conventions

What do you think of the allopathic discussion, in light of this WP:policy? I think it's applicable, and fits well with the compromise we've hammered out, and I'd be interested to see if you have any further thoughts. Thanks, Antelan 20:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Problem with finding population figures

Good work with Am Dam. There must be thousands missing like this all over africa and asia ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 10:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

What we do need is the get all of the sub prefectures of Chad up and running. There shouldn't be any problems with notability there ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ 10:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


Proposed deletion of Cult of intelligence

The rationale for the proposed deletion of the Cult of intelligence article is invalid so I've removed it. If you feel the article lack synthesis because the "intelligence" referred to in the book title is meant in the espionage sense. You should have understood the article is not only Victor Marchetti's book. It reflect that the fact that the term "cult of intelligence" has been used in different contexts as well. --Loremaster (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

  • When I search "cult of intelligence" -marchetti -cia -wikipedia I get 113 Google hits. If I search for marchetti OR cia OR espionage AND "cult of intelligence" I get 562 Google hits.

Am Dam

I remved the population figure mostly because it was irrelevant (the information should belong in the sub-prefecture's article, not the town's) while in the infobox it actually was misleading (it states that the population of the town was ~70,000 while it contradicted itself by saying the sub prefecture was that). While anyone with half a brain would probably understand what it meant, the population figure of the subprefecture should not be present nonetheless. Have I explained this well enough for you? I'm an Editorofthewiki 15:15, 16 June 2008 (UTC)