| Revision as of 06:26, 16 June 2008 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,529 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:28, 16 June 2008 edit undoFish and karate (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators36,448 editsm Protected Misplaced Pages talk:Biographies of living persons/Special enforcement log: No need for IP's making BLP-ey comments while this is not in place Next edit → |
| (No difference) | |
Revision as of 17:28, 16 June 2008
Shouldn't the blockquote have a footnote? --NE2 03:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- It does... Daniel (talk) 03:24, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, I mean a real footnote. With a long quote in it. And a revert war over the inclusion of the quote. --NE2 06:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ha, missed the pun totally. Daniel (talk) 06:26, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, I mean a real footnote. With a long quote in it. And a revert war over the inclusion of the quote. --NE2 06:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)