| Revision as of 16:11, 16 June 2008 editMacduffman (talk | contribs)297 edits →Columbus Blue Jackets: query← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:43, 16 June 2008 edit undoJbmurray (talk | contribs)Administrators20,564 edits →Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| DMHO, you're absolutely right, which is why I recently withdrew my !vote from and dropped a note on the candidate's , as well as . However, the latter went completely ignored and Majorly continued his pointy Support votes, which I ignored myself and plan to do so from now on. Cheers mate. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 06:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | DMHO, you're absolutely right, which is why I recently withdrew my !vote from and dropped a note on the candidate's , as well as . However, the latter went completely ignored and Majorly continued his pointy Support votes, which I ignored myself and plan to do so from now on. Cheers mate. ] <sub>(] / ])</sub> 06:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Supporting votes don't damage a candidate. Since when did someone who passed RFA quit because their RfA had too much support? How many have quit because of bitey, uncivil and unnecessary opposes from people like Wisdom89? Happens all the time. I am not the one doing damage here. ''']''' <sup>'']''</sup> 11:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | :Supporting votes don't damage a candidate. Since when did someone who passed RFA quit because their RfA had too much support? How many have quit because of bitey, uncivil and unnecessary opposes from people like Wisdom89? Happens all the time. I am not the one doing damage here. ''']''' <sup>'']''</sup> 11:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. You have previously indicated your interest in ], by directly editing that page before its transclusion. In order to improve the discussion there (and without trying to persuade you either to support or to oppose), I'm simply writing to tell you that the RfA is now live, and to encourage you to participate. Many thanks. --] (] • ]) 21:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:43, 16 June 2008
| Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Make it better; donate. (already have?) |
- Click here to leave a message.
- I will reply here unless you request otherwise.
- Email: g1ggyman@gmail.com
- If I leave a message on your talk page, I am watching it.
- {{talkback}} free zone—use it and be ignored.
.jpeg){kind=small} | Beware! This user's talk page is patrolled by talk page stalkers. |
Brisbane meetup invitation
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
 | |
Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!
Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:36, 7 June 2008 (UTC).
ID RfC volunteers
Hi, Giggy. Thanks for signing my talk page. I may not have time to contribute much in the next few days, so please feel free to start in on things if you're so inclined. Gnixon (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think I'll wait and observe from the sidelines a bit first. giggy (:O) 01:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just a heads up that I've started the discussion at User talk:Gnixon/Intelligent design RfC with ideas for a basis to formulate the RfC. We also must try to resolve the dispute and as a first step my suggestion is developing guidelines or procedures aimed improving behaviour from now on, so that the desired outcomes can be achieved amicably. Your assistance and comments will be much appreciated. . . dave souza, talk 14:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. giggy (:O) 08:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
2001 GA Review
Hi, I've taken care of most of the concerns on the 2001 article and left a message on the talk page, could you have a look ? Thanks - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Columbus Blue Jackets
- Thanks very much for your input. I will be placing the review on hold to allow for the suggestions to be addressed. :) Leafschik1967 (talk) 02:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Giggy -- thanks for taking some time with Leafschik to look at the Columbus Blue Jackets article. I've been working on the suggestions you two made, but I have to admit I'm a bit of a newbie and was confused by your comment about the references: Check that ALL references include publisher info outside of the URL title (if using cite web, you need a publisher=) Could you elaborate? Thanks very much! Macduffman (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Re RfA comments
DMHO, you're absolutely right, which is why I recently withdrew my !vote from this RfA and dropped a note on the candidate's talk page, as well as Majorly's. However, the latter went completely ignored and Majorly continued his pointy Support votes, which I ignored myself and plan to do so from now on. Cheers mate. Wisdom89 (T / ) 06:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- Supporting votes don't damage a candidate. Since when did someone who passed RFA quit because their RfA had too much support? How many have quit because of bitey, uncivil and unnecessary opposes from people like Wisdom89? Happens all the time. I am not the one doing damage here. Al Tally 11:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs
Hi. You have previously indicated your interest in Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs, by directly editing that page before its transclusion. In order to improve the discussion there (and without trying to persuade you either to support or to oppose), I'm simply writing to tell you that the RfA is now live, and to encourage you to participate. Many thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 21:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)