| Revision as of 00:58, 17 June 2008 editAshley kennedy3 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers14,243 edits →Jibrin← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:55, 17 June 2008 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,347 edits WP:ARBPIA notificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Ilan Pappé|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:Please stop introducing apparently deliberate grammatical errors into this article|Please stop introducing apparently deliberate grammatical errors into this article|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 21:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Ilan Pappé|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:Please stop introducing apparently deliberate grammatical errors into this article|Please stop introducing apparently deliberate grammatical errors into this article|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->] (]) 21:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==] == | |||
| As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| ] (]) 14:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 17 June 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Ashley kennedy3, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Kamope · talk · contributions 14:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Plan D
It is not Ilan Pappes POV, Ilan Pappe gives it as a direct quote from Ben-Gurion's Diary entry of the 11th May, footnote 2 to chapter 6. "The cleansing of Palestine remained the prime objective of Plan Dalet" Ben-Gurion uses the noun bi'ur which means either cleansing the leaven in Passover or 'root' out, eliminate. The sarcastic comment was that Galibrand was inferring that the Judaism project was lying.Ashley kennedy3 (talk) 09:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello Ashley,
- Benny Morris and Yoav Gelber give numerous quotes and facts concerning the Plan D that tend to show that this was absolutely not a plan of cleansing (or at least not ethnic cleansing). -I will write some of them- So why this quote and not all the others ones ?
- I think too that we can refer to Plan D in this article but not a bit more. And certainly not to put forward Ilan Pappe and Walid Khalidi's interpretation of it. Why should we develop the controversy concerning this here. This should be done in the article relating to the Plan.
- I still have not read all the article... Sorry for that. I am very busy these days. I will proceed asap. I expect this we.
- Kind Regards, Ceedjee (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi thank you for your last comment on my talk page, Ashley. :-)
- I come back asap. I am not at home and I need the references so that we can have a constructive discussion.
- Congratulations for your work anyway. I think globally you did a nice job :-)
- (Morris says that none order sent to any brigade officer refers to plan D before june. That would justify not to talk too much about that). But please, let me check the exact words and the exact dates :-)
- I see you know the topic very well. I suggest you Morris last book. Great job from my point of view and the book is quite cheap. More, this is readable, not like his Birth... Revisited. Ceedjee (talk) 16:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Revert warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ilan Pappé. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please stop introducing apparently deliberate grammatical errors into this articleRolandR (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles
As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the Arbitration committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged here.