| Revision as of 14:16, 27 August 2005 editBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,267 edits ==Please edit informationally==← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:18, 30 August 2005 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,267 edits ==Crossposted to Talk:Bogdanov Affair: block==Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ==Please edit informationally== | ==Please edit informationally== | ||
| Hi, Sophie. I note that you started editing ] in all caps again as soon as the 24-hour block ended. Please don't do that, it's seen as yelling, and it does look "hysterical", as your opponents on the page say. It's very hard for an outsider to follow what you say, especially if they can't read French, as all your references are to webpages in French. Could you try to find webpages in English to refer to as evidence for your claims? I myself found an English page by YMB about the Bogdanoff affair pretty easily through Google, so it can't be impossible. Please adduce facts and evidence to your claims, so that readers have a chance to evaluate them. Your editing does look better than before the block, so I won't re-block you right now. But if I see you do more name-calling or using all caps on that page again, I'm afraid I'll have to. Best wishes, ] | ] 14:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC) | Hi, Sophie. I note that you started editing ] in all caps again as soon as the 24-hour block ended. Please don't do that, it's seen as yelling, and it does look "hysterical", as your opponents on the page say. It's very hard for an outsider to follow what you say, especially if they can't read French, as all your references are to webpages in French. Could you try to find webpages in English to refer to as evidence for your claims? I myself found an English page by YMB about the Bogdanoff affair pretty easily through Google, so it can't be impossible. Please adduce facts and evidence to your claims, so that readers have a chance to evaluate them. Your editing does look better than before the block, so I won't re-block you right now. But if I see you do more name-calling or using all caps on that page again, I'm afraid I'll have to. Best wishes, ] | ] 14:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Crossposted to ]: block== | |||
| I'm sorry, but the purpose of the page is to let people discuss the article, and this editing style of yours is driving off everybody who was actually doing that. I'm blocking you for one week, purely so as to allow the page to be used. Do please note that you can still edit your own talk page, and you can still e-mail other users. If you're willing to edit more to the purpose, please e-mail me, and I'll consider shortening the block. ] | ] 01:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:18, 30 August 2005
You have been blocked for 24 hours for disruptive edits at Talk:Bogdanov Affair, particularly this edit and this legal threat. Please see Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks and Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. Please edit more constructively when you return. Bishonen | talk 01:51, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
Please edit informationally
Hi, Sophie. I note that you started editing Talk:Bogdanov Affair in all caps again as soon as the 24-hour block ended. Please don't do that, it's seen as yelling, and it does look "hysterical", as your opponents on the page say. It's very hard for an outsider to follow what you say, especially if they can't read French, as all your references are to webpages in French. Could you try to find webpages in English to refer to as evidence for your claims? I myself found an English page by YMB about the Bogdanoff affair pretty easily through Google, so it can't be impossible. Please adduce facts and evidence to your claims, so that readers have a chance to evaluate them. Your editing does look better than before the block, so I won't re-block you right now. But if I see you do more name-calling or using all caps on that page again, I'm afraid I'll have to. Best wishes, Bishonen | talk 14:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Crossposted to Talk:Bogdanov Affair: block
I'm sorry, but the purpose of the page is to let people discuss the article, and this editing style of yours is driving off everybody who was actually doing that. I'm blocking you for one week, purely so as to allow the page to be used. Do please note that you can still edit your own talk page, and you can still e-mail other users. If you're willing to edit more to the purpose, please e-mail me, and I'll consider shortening the block. Bishonen | talk 01:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)