| Revision as of 06:33, 30 August 2005 editEngleman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,569 edits Road Infobox vs. this one← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:46, 30 August 2005 edit undoRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Is there any reason that ] is prefferred over ]? --] 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | Is there any reason that ] is prefferred over ]? --] 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Yes there are reasons: the other state hwy WPs use this format, this one provides more info, etc. This project was originally developed to have a multi-state routebox since the CA and WA WPs want certain info in the routebox (but then the project eventually grew to what it is today). There are certain characteristics of an interstate that just aren't adequately ddressed in the road infobox template. --] | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 30 August 2005
Improvement drive
The article on Transportation is currently nominated on Misplaced Pages:This week's improvement drive. Vote for Transportation there.--Fenice 09:11, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Road Infobox vs. this one
Is there any reason that Template:Routeboxint is prefferred over Template:Infobox road? --Engleman 06:33, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
- Yes there are reasons: the other state hwy WPs use this format, this one provides more info, etc. This project was originally developed to have a multi-state routebox since the CA and WA WPs want certain info in the routebox (but then the project eventually grew to what it is today). There are certain characteristics of an interstate that just aren't adequately ddressed in the road infobox template. --Rschen7754