Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bircham: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:45, 25 January 2008 editWaggers (talk | contribs)Administrators46,749 edits You have been blocked for making legal threats.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:08, 26 June 2008 edit undoBircham (talk | contribs)30 edits ​Created page with 'Madrid, June 25, 2008 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Attn.: Non-Editorial staff and in-house counsel P.O. Box 78350 San Francisco, CA 94107-8350 USA Via Certified...'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Madrid, June 25, 2008
{{#if:{{{border|}}}|<div style="background:white; border:2px {{{border|Blue}}} solid; padding:12px;">|}}
{{#ifeq:{{{heading|}}}|true|==|'''}}{{{headtext|Welcome...}}}{{#ifeq:{{{heading|}}}|true|==|'''}}
{| align="right" style="margin-left: 12px; background: white; border: 1px #cccccc solid;"
|
]<br/>
''']'''
|}
<p>Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ''''']!''''' I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some useful pages to help you get started:</p>
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
<p>I hope you enjoy contributing as much as I do. When posting on discussion pages, ] your messages with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your name and the date. If you need help, please see our ''']''', or ask your question and place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page. You may also leave me a message on my discussion page. {{#if:{{{1|}}}|</p><p>{{{1}}}</p><p>||}}Happy editing! {{#if:{{{nosig|}}}||] (], ]) 20:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)}}</p> {{{2|}}}{{#if:{{{border|}}}|</div>|}}
<div style="background-color:#F9F9F9; border:1px solid #AAA; padding:5px;"> ] Hello. Please don't forget to provide an ]. Thanks, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Editsummary --></div>


{{{icon|] }}}If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about {{#if:{{{1|}}}|in the article ]|on Misplaced Pages}}, you may have a ]. In keeping with Misplaced Pages's ] policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should '''avoid''' or '''exercise great caution''' when:
#'''editing''' articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
#'''participating''' in ] about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
# '''linking''' to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see ]);
#:and you must always:
# '''avoid breaching''' relevant policies and guidelines, especially ], ], and ].


Wikimedia Foundation Inc.
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have conflict of interest, please see ]. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ] (]) 11:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Attn.: Non-Editorial staff and in-house counsel
P.O. Box 78350
San Francisco, CA 94107-8350 USA


Via Certified Mail and Fax: +1-415-882-0495 and email: info@wikimedia.org
== Please stop ==


Re:Corrections and Updates of sources and information on the Misplaced Pages Website for the entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/Bircham_International_University
If you continue reverting to yoru preferred version of the article on an institution with which you are by your own admission associated, I will have to block you from editing. Please restrict yourself to civil discourse on the discussion page. Thanks. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 14:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)




Dear Madam or Sir,
==Legal threats - User:Bircham==
See ] and ] --] ] 20:22, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


This further to our previous communications, the last of March 10, 2008 (enclose copy) and the response received by WIKIPEDIA EDITOR Mr. Guy Chapman via email, the only formal response we have received from your organization.
== January 2008 ==
{{{icon|] }}}Your recent edits {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Bircham International University|to ]}} could give editors of Misplaced Pages the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Misplaced Pages itself. Please note that this is '''''strictly prohibited''''' under Misplaced Pages's policies on ] and ]. Users who make such threats may be ]. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-legal --> ] (]) 22:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
1. There is a direct link from the International Organization for Continuing Education & Training (IACET) to Bircham International University (hereinafter “BIU”) as Authorized Providers of Continuing Education Units (CEUs):


See http://www.iacet.org click on the IACET Authorized Provider Directory and enter BIU.
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for making ]. You are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages as long as the threat stands. If you believe that a legal action is warranted, you may contact our information team at '''''' and they may forward it to our legal counsel or a more appropriate venue. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:true|] (]) 22:45, 25 January 2008 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3}} -->{{{category|]}}}

IACET IS A REFERENCE RECOGNIZED BY WIKIPEDIA AS A SPECIFIC ORGANIZATION WHICH ACCREDITS CONTINUING EDUCATION UNITS AND PROGRAMS.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/continuing_education_unit

2.  There is a direct link showing qualification and membership since 2004 from ANCED (the “Asociación de Centros de Enseñanza a Distancia de España” or the Association of Long Distance e-Learning Centers in Spain) certified per ISO 9001:2000 (the International Organization for Standardization) the world’s largest developer and publisher of International Standards) to BIU.

In addition, PriceWaterhouseCoopers has AUDITED ALL MEMBER CENTERS of ANCED (a “high quality reference” per your editorial policy) for quality, including human, material, and technical resources, as well as student satisfaction, with optimal results from all members including BIU. See ANCED website.
The ANCED guarantees full compliance with the EU directives for long distance learning centers and in particular the compliance with the Spanish implementation of such directives (i.e. the Real Decreto-ley 2641/1980, de 7 de noviembre, sobre regulación de la modalidad de enseñanza a distancia impartida por centros privados)

See http://www.anced.es/certificados/ANCED-BIU.jpg


3.  The Spanish IRS certifies that BIU is a provider of continuing education in good standing since 2000.

See https://www5.aeat.es/es13/s/TLECTLCECCEN?ACCESO=AG&CEL=646F716F0AA768A5

This reference and live link is as valid as any other US State Department corporations entry that certifies that BIU is “in good standing” and representing that such party is duly organized and validly existing under the laws its country of incorporation and up to date with filing and annual fees.


4. WIKIPEDIA footnote 4 to APICS or the Academy for the Promotion of International Culture and Scientific Exchange website (Accademia per la Promozione Internazionale della Cultura e della Scienza) has been inactivated wherefore it should be deleted.

See http://www.apics.com/news.htm


5. WIKIPEDIA footnote 20 to the Oregon Office of Degree Authorization which simply lists BIU as a Foreign Degree Supplier, was rectified by this Office, and does NOT support the statement in the WIKIPEDIA entry that “the Oregon Office of Degree Authorization alerted the public that this institution had “no connection to legitimate Oxford University in Great Britain”.


6. WIKIPEDIA footnote 15, an article from 2003 by City Link was also rectified by this publication and yet WIKIPEDIA has failed to remove the link.


7. WIKIPEDIA may or should add reference to the IARC (the International Accreditation & Recognition Council) as a membership in good standing. BIU had to go through a fairly stringent review and quality process in order to be accepted.

See http://www.iarcedu.com/directory.aspx


There are additional live links that that BIU is pursuing to have published and sourced via Internet so as to conform to WIKIPEDIA’S policy of neutrality, verifiability, and sourcing mainly through Internet, including certifications from the Spanish Ministry of Health and the Madrid Chamber of Commerce which will be communicated in due course.


Spain is in the process of implanting an international scheme of educational accreditation regulation and degree-granting authority similar to that already existing in other countries and, of which, of course we shall notify WIKIPEDIA as soon as implanted.

See www.planavanza.es/Noticias/Calidad+de+la+Formación+Virtual.htm

The argument for not changing the absolute outrageous write up seems to stem from the fact that BIU has not undertaken to get accredited in the US. A process which the BIU has determined is too expensive and not cost efficient.



In today’s world, and considering WIKIPEDIA’S global aspirations, it is unacceptable that you continue to ignore actual international, recognized, and verified sources such as ISO and PriceWaterhouseCoopers in your entry regarding BIU. The fact that some of the links are to foreign (Spanish) language certification society’s is a poor excuse for WIKIPEDIA not living up to its NPOW policy.

The fact that the person appointed to oversee this particular entry may not even be Spanish speaking or qualified to determine the value of the entry is even more damaging. The reliance solely on one source, the John Bear’s guide, a publication which is not even a live link and outdated, undoes the threshold for inclusion in WIKIPEDIA in that it is neither verifiable or truth in any context as readers cannot check the material. We believe that refusal to include current, updated and verifiable official sources simply does not conform to the principle of protection envsioned by the Communication Decency Act.

BIU requests that WIKIPEDIA include the links stated above, including IACET and ANCED with their references to ISO and the PriceWaterHouse audit and revise cited sources, update the entry, and respond to this communication with copy to Ms. Raïssa Rouse, Esq. copied herein.

Revision as of 15:08, 26 June 2008

Madrid, June 25, 2008


Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Attn.: Non-Editorial staff and in-house counsel P.O. Box 78350 San Francisco, CA 94107-8350 USA

Via Certified Mail and Fax: +1-415-882-0495 and email: info@wikimedia.org

Re:Corrections and Updates of sources and information on the Misplaced Pages Website for the entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/Bircham_International_University


Dear Madam or Sir,

This further to our previous communications, the last of March 10, 2008 (enclose copy) and the response received by WIKIPEDIA EDITOR Mr. Guy Chapman via email, the only formal response we have received from your organization.

1. There is a direct link from the International Organization for Continuing Education & Training (IACET) to Bircham International University (hereinafter “BIU”) as Authorized Providers of Continuing Education Units (CEUs):

See http://www.iacet.org click on the IACET Authorized Provider Directory and enter BIU.

IACET IS A REFERENCE RECOGNIZED BY WIKIPEDIA AS A SPECIFIC ORGANIZATION WHICH ACCREDITS CONTINUING EDUCATION UNITS AND PROGRAMS.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/continuing_education_unit

2.  There is a direct link showing qualification and membership since 2004 from ANCED (the “Asociación de Centros de Enseñanza a Distancia de España” or the Association of Long Distance e-Learning Centers in Spain) certified per ISO 9001:2000 (the International Organization for Standardization) the world’s largest developer and publisher of International Standards) to BIU.

In addition, PriceWaterhouseCoopers has AUDITED ALL MEMBER CENTERS of ANCED (a “high quality reference” per your editorial policy) for quality, including human, material, and technical resources, as well as student satisfaction, with optimal results from all members including BIU. See ANCED website. The ANCED guarantees full compliance with the EU directives for long distance learning centers and in particular the compliance with the Spanish implementation of such directives (i.e. the Real Decreto-ley 2641/1980, de 7 de noviembre, sobre regulación de la modalidad de enseñanza a distancia impartida por centros privados)

See http://www.anced.es/certificados/ANCED-BIU.jpg


3.  The Spanish IRS certifies that BIU is a provider of continuing education in good standing since 2000.

See https://www5.aeat.es/es13/s/TLECTLCECCEN?ACCESO=AG&CEL=646F716F0AA768A5

This reference and live link is as valid as any other US State Department corporations entry that certifies that BIU is “in good standing” and representing that such party is duly organized and validly existing under the laws its country of incorporation and up to date with filing and annual fees.


4. WIKIPEDIA footnote 4 to APICS or the Academy for the Promotion of International Culture and Scientific Exchange website (Accademia per la Promozione Internazionale della Cultura e della Scienza) has been inactivated wherefore it should be deleted.

See http://www.apics.com/news.htm


5. WIKIPEDIA footnote 20 to the Oregon Office of Degree Authorization which simply lists BIU as a Foreign Degree Supplier, was rectified by this Office, and does NOT support the statement in the WIKIPEDIA entry that “the Oregon Office of Degree Authorization alerted the public that this institution had “no connection to legitimate Oxford University in Great Britain”.


6. WIKIPEDIA footnote 15, an article from 2003 by City Link was also rectified by this publication and yet WIKIPEDIA has failed to remove the link.


7. WIKIPEDIA may or should add reference to the IARC (the International Accreditation & Recognition Council) as a membership in good standing. BIU had to go through a fairly stringent review and quality process in order to be accepted.

See http://www.iarcedu.com/directory.aspx


There are additional live links that that BIU is pursuing to have published and sourced via Internet so as to conform to WIKIPEDIA’S policy of neutrality, verifiability, and sourcing mainly through Internet, including certifications from the Spanish Ministry of Health and the Madrid Chamber of Commerce which will be communicated in due course.


Spain is in the process of implanting an international scheme of educational accreditation regulation and degree-granting authority similar to that already existing in other countries and, of which, of course we shall notify WIKIPEDIA as soon as implanted.

See www.planavanza.es/Noticias/Calidad+de+la+Formación+Virtual.htm

The argument for not changing the absolute outrageous write up seems to stem from the fact that BIU has not undertaken to get accredited in the US. A process which the BIU has determined is too expensive and not cost efficient.


In today’s world, and considering WIKIPEDIA’S global aspirations, it is unacceptable that you continue to ignore actual international, recognized, and verified sources such as ISO and PriceWaterhouseCoopers in your entry regarding BIU. The fact that some of the links are to foreign (Spanish) language certification society’s is a poor excuse for WIKIPEDIA not living up to its NPOW policy.

The fact that the person appointed to oversee this particular entry may not even be Spanish speaking or qualified to determine the value of the entry is even more damaging. The reliance solely on one source, the John Bear’s guide, a publication which is not even a live link and outdated, undoes the threshold for inclusion in WIKIPEDIA in that it is neither verifiable or truth in any context as readers cannot check the material. We believe that refusal to include current, updated and verifiable official sources simply does not conform to the principle of protection envsioned by the Communication Decency Act.

BIU requests that WIKIPEDIA include the links stated above, including IACET and ANCED with their references to ISO and the PriceWaterHouse audit and revise cited sources, update the entry, and respond to this communication with copy to Ms. Raïssa Rouse, Esq. copied herein.