| Revision as of 02:37, 28 June 2008 editC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,596 edits →June 2008: npov violation - not vandalism per se, so caution rather than block← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:29, 28 June 2008 edit undoC.Fred (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators277,596 edits blocked - 72h - vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| *While it's not vandalism per se, introducing personal opinions into articles, as you did to ], is against guidelines. Maintain a ] in articles. Failure to do so may also lead to you being blocked. —''']''' (]) 02:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | *While it's not vandalism per se, introducing personal opinions into articles, as you did to ], is against guidelines. Maintain a ] in articles. Failure to do so may also lead to you being blocked. —''']''' (]) 02:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *, however, is vandalism. | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''reason'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:1|—''']''' (]) 19:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> | |||
Revision as of 19:29, 28 June 2008
Hello my fans. I'm I'm Smarter(cool name.)
== June 2008 =I'm great!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Your test on Campbell Brown worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Catgut is an odd namme.
The recent edit you made to Lord Voldemort has been reverted, as it appears to intentionally introduce incorrect information. Please do not continue to do this; such edits are considered vandalism. Thanks. Catgut (talk) 02:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Abraham Jarvis. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
CWii quit. He scared me.
Speedy deletion of "Shobalobalobadingdong"
A page you created, Shobalobalobadingdong, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 02:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Cwii2, what a joke.
June 2008
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Big Momma's House. ukexpat (talk) 03:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, I will not remove the final warning. All of your edits so far have been tantamount to vandalism. If you stop and edit constructively you will not be blocked, it's as simple as that. Thank you. And please remember to sign your messages on talk pages. – ukexpat (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- While it's not vandalism per se, introducing personal opinions into articles, as you did to Nazism, is against guidelines. Maintain a neutral point of view in articles. Failure to do so may also lead to you being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- This edit, however, is vandalism.
