Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alison: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:36, 31 August 2005 editKwekubo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,807 edits Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006← Previous edit Revision as of 08:33, 31 August 2005 edit undoAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,260 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


<!-- Comments below here, kiddiez --> <!-- Comments below here, kiddiez -->

==]==


Hello. It is POV to say that his actions were "egregious" (''Wordnet: conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible''). Misplaced Pages is not here to judge what is "outrageously bad"; we present information in an npov way and try to not abuse adjectives. You can leave it up to the reader to judge whether his actions were "egregious" (and especially whether they were the ''most'' egregious). I'm not defending his actions, but if we present the facts, then readers should be able to judge for themselves that he was egregious without us preaching it to them. ] 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC) Hello. It is POV to say that his actions were "egregious" (''Wordnet: conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible''). Misplaced Pages is not here to judge what is "outrageously bad"; we present information in an npov way and try to not abuse adjectives. You can leave it up to the reader to judge whether his actions were "egregious" (and especially whether they were the ''most'' egregious). I'm not defending his actions, but if we present the facts, then readers should be able to judge for themselves that he was egregious without us preaching it to them. ] 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

*Answered on ] - ]<sup><font color="DarkRed">]</font></sup> 08:33, 31 August 2005 (UTC)


==Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006== ==Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006==

Revision as of 08:33, 31 August 2005

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.


Brendan Smyth

Hello. It is POV to say that his actions were "egregious" (Wordnet: conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible). Misplaced Pages is not here to judge what is "outrageously bad"; we present information in an npov way and try to not abuse adjectives. You can leave it up to the reader to judge whether his actions were "egregious" (and especially whether they were the most egregious). I'm not defending his actions, but if we present the facts, then readers should be able to judge for themselves that he was egregious without us preaching it to them. 24.224.153.40 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK/Wikimania 2006

Hi, this is a circular to Wikipedians in Ireland to draw your attention to Wikimedia UK, where the establishment of a local Wikimedia chapter for the United Kingdom (and possibly for the Republic of Ireland) is being discussed. See the talk page, as well as the mailing list; a meetup will take place to discuss matters in London in September, for anyone who can get there. On another topic, plans are being drawn up for a UK bid for Wikimania 2006, which would be conveniently close to Ireland. On the other hand, Dublin's bid was one of the final three last year - might we bid again? --Kwekubo 03:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)