Revision as of 20:11, 3 July 2008 editJeanLatore (talk | contribs)1,170 edits moved pawn to q4← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:51, 5 July 2008 edit undoWadewitz (talk | contribs)50,892 edits →FA-Team Proposals: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
I am interested at some point in the future in working my way up to "admin." What do you think I need to work on as of now in order to challenge an "RFA"? ] (]) 04:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | I am interested at some point in the future in working my way up to "admin." What do you think I need to work on as of now in order to challenge an "RFA"? ] (]) 04:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
== FA-Team Proposals == | |||
Please comment on the ]. Thanks! ] (]) 16:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:51, 5 July 2008
This user is a Cabal of One. |
Anyone up for chess?
nd
|
Sasquatch v. World (Sasquatch to move) 1.e4 c5 2. Nc3 e6 3. b3 d5 4. exd5 exd5 5. Qe2+ Be7 6. Ba3 b6 7. Nf4 Nf6
2008 Sichuan Earthquake
Mate I'm not trying to make a political statement, I'm just trying remain neutral. The page previous to edit was far from neutral. Taiwan's status is "staus quo." Not an independent nation nor part of China. Is that alright?Jackchen123 (talk) 01:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was not aware of this policy. Whilst I do not agree with it I will accept it, and will revert my changes (if not already done so.) Thank you for your advice. Jackchen123 (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
RE:7.8or7.9?
Here is the offical website of Chinese Seismology Bureaus "2008-05-12 14:28:04.1 30.95 103.40 33 Ms7.8 四川汶川县 " This webpage is the auto-release seismology information page ,therefore the page only conserve in 7days (= =)--Prinz.W (talk) 04:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Messages
Hello, Sasquatch. You have new messages at CWii's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello there.
I heard that you are a nice man. Would you be interested in mentoring an autistic user that likes to write articles? Thanks, JeanLatore (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
The FA-Team
Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for suspending me, I appreciate it
You said blocked users to email you, duh, i cant even create email, since you people blocked that option.
Did you read administrators board, did you read provocation http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:68.144.163.60&diff=prev&oldid=215804118
- http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Pharos#Edit_Feud_Problem
- Is this wrong, do you just look at a person i am protecting, just because of that or some ranting i deserve to be blocked, you could have at least reverted privacy violation then block me, shame on you forever, this certainly will be remembered pal...so nice of you, thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.107.219.187 (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi
thank you for contacting me on my talk page. where do i begin? i like working on wikipedia, and have had account since early apirl 2008. i like writing articles, and you can see on my user page the ones that i wrote, although i think the "Lo-Ji Sales" one is the best one so far. How to get article to "featured article" status? I wrote Handlebars (song) and that could go FA mayhaps. JeanLatore (talk) 00:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi how are you doing? I have a few questions. JeanLatore (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
why yes
Actually, I just joined "wiki project US supreme ct. articles." I understand what you mean, i'm trying to play it cool w/ other editors on talk space and focus more on article writing. Did you see some of my shit? JeanLatore (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
You know, I'm starting to get fed up. All i really want to do is write articles on law related topics (and I think I've done a good job for a new editor) but even this seems to draw all kinds of criticism and everytime I interact with any users they jump all over me and accuse me of being "uncivil," "sexist," "obscene," etc. Is it appropriate just to write articles only and have no interaction with other users via talk pages (except for talk messages soley about improvement of the articles)? It seems like everytime I respond to any message on my talk page things fly off the handle... JeanLatore (talk) 04:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thanks
Thanks for the heads up on the Florida v. J.L. article. I actually meant to remove the entire link though and not just the disambiguation. The other editor was blatantly overlinking. He/she also wasn't building much good faith by going around adding thinks like this to articles that I had previously removed. A user that refers to women by sexist endearments and uses obscenities on talk pages, as JeanLatore does, stretches good faith to its limits.
For what it's worth, I also have a slight WP:COI fear with JeanLatore. It's probably just a coincidence, but JeanLatore's initials are J.L., as in Florida v. J.L. The user also authored a page about Parole in Florida, something the real J.L. would probably be familiar with. Several other things on JeanLatore's user page would also fit the profile of J.L., but it's a connection that I would say is possible but not probable. Chicken Wing (talk) 01:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
(to above comment) Hmmm.... Interesting! Furthermore, I would like to say thanks for the tip on my talk page, Sasquatch... good idea...not responding to messages unless I absolutely have to! I honestly hadn't even thought of that but I am going to apply it from now on. Thanks, JeanLatore (talk) 01:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC).
Blanking talk pages
Is there a policy you were enforcing, or was it your own point of view that my page was "not appropriate"? Fasach Nua (talk) 05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
FA-Team Mission 4
Mission 4, a series of articles on the Everglades, could do with help from the FA-Team! Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
RFA
I am interested at some point in the future in working my way up to "admin." What do you think I need to work on as of now in order to challenge an "RFA"? JeanLatore (talk) 04:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
FA-Team Proposals
Please comment on the current FA-Team proposals. Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)