| Revision as of 14:48, 11 December 2003 editDogface (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,629 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:28, 27 January 2004 edit undoCOGDEN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,050 editsm fixed linkNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Excommunication is also practiced in ] (commonly known as the "Mormons"). It is generally reserved only for serious ]s such as ], apostasy, teaching false doctrines, and un-Christianlike conduct. Excommuniation need not be a permanent state; excommunicated members may become bona fide members again once they have worked through a sincere ]. In the case of apostasy, excommunication is often done as a last resort after repeatingly working with Church members who refuse to stop teaching publicly their personal viewpoints as official Church doctrines after being asked not to teach them multimple times by local leaders. | Excommunication is also practiced in ] (commonly known as the "Mormons"). It is generally reserved only for serious ]s such as ], apostasy, teaching false doctrines, and un-Christianlike conduct. Excommuniation need not be a permanent state; excommunicated members may become bona fide members again once they have worked through a sincere ]. In the case of apostasy, excommunication is often done as a last resort after repeatingly working with Church members who refuse to stop teaching publicly their personal viewpoints as official Church doctrines after being asked not to teach them multimple times by local leaders. | ||
| Some Church critics charged LDS leaders with using the threat of excommunication to silence member researchers and critics who disagree with established Church policy and doctrines. However, Church policy dictactes that local leaders are responsible for excommunication, without influence from General Church leadership. Church apologists claim that many alleged excommunications never take place or are used as a publicity stunt to draw attention to their cause for gain. A recent example they point to is Thomas Murphy, who claimed the Church was going to excommunicate him because his DNA research (see ]). Such an excommunication to this date has never taken place or been arranged. | Some Church critics charged LDS leaders with using the threat of excommunication to silence member researchers and critics who disagree with established Church policy and doctrines. However, Church policy dictactes that local leaders are responsible for excommunication, without influence from General Church leadership. Church apologists claim that many alleged excommunications never take place or are used as a publicity stunt to draw attention to their cause for gain. A recent example they point to is Thomas Murphy, who claimed the Church was going to excommunicate him because his DNA research (see ]). Such an excommunication to this date has never taken place or been arranged. | ||
| == Jehovah's Witnesses == | == Jehovah's Witnesses == | ||
Revision as of 16:28, 27 January 2004
Excommunication is religious censure intended to deprive one of membership of a religious community.
Roman Catholicism
Excommunication is considered automatic for some sins within the Roman Catholic but can also be a formal affair, generally reserved for renegade clerygymen and such.
The word literally means "out of communion"; the outward sign of this loss of community involves barring the person from participating in Communion, i.e., receiving the Eucharist, and as a consequence losing their status as members of the church. Certain other rights and privileges normally resulting from membership of the church are revoked. Excommunication is often intended to be only temporary, a "medicinal" procedure intended to provoke repentance. In the Roman Catholic church excommunication is usually terminated by repentance and absolution. For minor excommunications the absolution may be pronounced by a confessor (a Priest). More serious offences must be absolved by a more senior official.
Automatic excommunication
There are seven sins for which Roman Catholics are automatically excommunicated:
- Apostasy, Heresy, or Schism
- Desecration of the Eucharist
- Physical force against the Pontiff
- One who actually procures an abortion and all accomplices
- Priest who absolves a partner in adultery
- Priest who directly violates the sacramental seal of confession
- Both parties to the consecration of a bishop without a pontifical mandate
Eastern Orthodoxy
In the Orthodox Church, "excommunication" refers to any situation in which a member is required to refrain from eucharist. It is not expulsion from the Church. This can happen due to minor reasons like not having confessed within that year or be imposed as part of a penitential period. The Orthodox Church does have a means of expulsion, by pronouncing anathema, but this is reserved only for acts of serious and unrepetant heresy. Even in that case, the individual is not "damned" by the Church but is instead left to his own devices.
In Mormon theology
Excommunication is also practiced in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly known as the "Mormons"). It is generally reserved only for serious sins such as adultery, apostasy, teaching false doctrines, and un-Christianlike conduct. Excommuniation need not be a permanent state; excommunicated members may become bona fide members again once they have worked through a sincere repentance. In the case of apostasy, excommunication is often done as a last resort after repeatingly working with Church members who refuse to stop teaching publicly their personal viewpoints as official Church doctrines after being asked not to teach them multimple times by local leaders.
Some Church critics charged LDS leaders with using the threat of excommunication to silence member researchers and critics who disagree with established Church policy and doctrines. However, Church policy dictactes that local leaders are responsible for excommunication, without influence from General Church leadership. Church apologists claim that many alleged excommunications never take place or are used as a publicity stunt to draw attention to their cause for gain. A recent example they point to is Thomas Murphy, who claimed the Church was going to excommunicate him because his DNA research (see Archaeology and the Book of Mormon). Such an excommunication to this date has never taken place or been arranged.
Jehovah's Witnesses
Jehovah's Witnesses resort to disfellowshipping in cases where a person has seriously violated the group's moral standards, based on their understanding of the Bible. Disfellowshipping is not automatic, in most cases follows repeated violations. If a judicial committee established by the congregation is convinced that the person has not repented of the sin committed, disfellowshipping will result. If the person believes that an error in judgment has been made, he or she has the right to appeal and have the case investigated by a committee of more experienced elders from another congregation. Disfellowshipped persons may be reintegrated into the congregation if they cease the activities that led to their disfellowshipping and give evidence of having repented; they will not, however, be considered eligible for special privileges, such as being a congregation elder, for a number of years after their reinstatement. For more information, see Practices of Jehovah's Witnesses and Shunning.
In Judaism
Cherem is the highest ecclesiastical censure in the Jewish community. It is the total exclusion of a person from the Jewish community. Except in rare cases in the Ultra-Orthodox community, cherem stopped existing after The Enlightenment, when local Jewish communities lost their political autonomy, and Jews were integrated into the greater gentile nations which they lived in. A fuller discussion of this subject is available in the cherem article.