Misplaced Pages

P. N. Oak: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:08, 14 July 2008 editTripping Nambiar (talk | contribs)4,883 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:08, 14 July 2008 edit undoTripping Nambiar (talk | contribs)4,883 editsm no fundamentalsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Purushottam Nagesh Oak''' (March 2nd 1917 - December 4th 2007), commonly referred to as '''P. N. Oak''', was an ] notable for his ] ] ]. '''Purushottam Nagesh Oak''' (March 2nd 1917 - December 4th 2007), commonly referred to as '''P. N. Oak''', was an ] notable for his ] ] ].


==Biography== ==Biography==

Revision as of 02:08, 14 July 2008

Purushottam Nagesh Oak (March 2nd 1917 - December 4th 2007), commonly referred to as P. N. Oak, was an Indian notable for his Hindu nationalist pseudohistorical revisionism.

Biography

According to the introduction of one of P. N. Oak's books, he was born in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. During World War II he joined the Indian National Army, which fought with the Japanese against the British. He obtained M.A and L.L.B degrees from Mumbai University. From 1947 to 1953 he was a reporter for the The Hindustan Times and The Statesman newspapers. From 1953 to 1957, he worked in India's Central Radio and Public Ministry. From 1959 to 1974, he worked at the American Embassy in New Delhi.

Revisionist theories

Intent on rectifying what he believes to be "biased and distorted versions of India's history produced by the invaders and colonizers", Oak has written several books and articles on Indian history and founded the Institute for Rewriting Indian History on June 141964. According to Oak, modern secular and Marxist historians have fabricated "idealized versions" of India's past and drained it of its Vedic context and content. Oak's work typically seeks to proclaim the virtues and achievements of Hindu culture and religion over other traditions.

While Oak's theories have been publicized by some contemporary Hindutva adherents, none of Oak's assertions have been accepted by mainstream scholars of religious and architectural history. Edwin Bryant writes that most academics would consider him a 'crackpot'. Art historian Rebecca Brown describes Oak's books as "revisionist history as subtle as Captain Russell's smirk" (referring to a character in the Hindi movie Lagaan).

Taj Mahal and other Islamic monuments

In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak claims that the Taj Mahal was originally a Shiva temple or a Rajput palace seized by Shah Jahan and adopted as a tomb.

The Taj, Oak says, is a "typical illustration of how all historic buildings and townships from Kashmir to Cape Comorin though of Hindu origin have been ascribed to this or that Muslim ruler or courtier". He goes on to propose Hindu origins for the tombs of Humayun, Akbar and Itmiad-u-Dallah and "all historic buildings" in India as well as the Vatican, the Kaaba and Stonehenge.

Oak's denial of Islamic architecture in India has been described as one of the "more extreme manifestations of anti-Muslim sentiment" in Maharashtrian popular culture. K. N. Panikkar locates Oak's work in the Hindu nationalist attempt to foster a communal understanding of Indian history. Tapan Raychaudhuri has referred to him as "a 'historian' much respected by the Sangh Parivar."

Oak claims that Hindu ornaments and symbols were effaced from the Taj, whose sealed chambers hold the remnants, including a Shiva Lingam, of the original temple and that Mumtaz Mahal was not buried at her cenotaph.

In support of these claims, Oak presents carbon dating results of the wood from the riverside doorway of the Taj, quotes from European travellers' accounts and the Taj's Hindu architectural features. Oak further alleges that eyewitness accounts of the Taj Mahal's construction as well as Shah Jahan's construction orders and voluminous financial records are elaborate frauds meant to hide its Hindu origin.

P. S. Bhat and A. L. Athawale write in the Itihas Patrika, a publication of the Institute for Rewriting Indian History, in support of Oak, saying his writings "place in perspective some of the pertinent questions that arise on the subject".

Legal action

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Oak petitioned demanding that the Taj be declared a Hindu monument and that cenotaphs and sealed apartments be opened to determine whether Shivalingam or other temple remains were hidden in them. According to Oak, the Indian government's refusal to allow him unfettered access amounts to a conspiracy against Hinduism.

In 2000 India's Supreme Court dismissed Oak's petition to declare that a Hindu king had built the Taj Mahal and reprimanded him for bringing the action, saying he had a "bee in his bonnet" about the Taj.

In 2005 a similar petition was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court. This case was brought by Amar Nath Mishra, a social worker and preacher who says that the Taj Mahal was built by the Hindu King Parmar Dev in 1196.

The Kaaba

In a 13 page pamphlet headed 'WAS KAABA A HINDU TEMPLE? IS ALLAH A HINDU GOD?', Oak derives a claim of a "Vedic past of Arabia" based on an alleged inscription mentioning king Vikramāditya found at the Kaaba. The text of the inscription Oak quotes from takes from a manuscript he identifies as Sayar-ul-Okul,, allegedly a manuscript anthology of Arabic poetry kept in the Makhtab-e-Sultania Library in Istanbul, Turkey. Oak claims the anthology was compiled in 1742 on the orders of a "Sultan Salim" (the actual Sultan at the time being Mahmud I), and alleges it was first edited in 1864 in Berlin. The Sayar ul-Okul has since appeared in various other Hindutva publications, always crediting Oak, but is unknown to the pertinent Arabist reference works.

Hindu origins of Islam and Chistianity

Oak claims that both Islam and Christianity originated as distortions of "Vedic" beliefs, proposing ad-hoc pseudo-etymologies of Islamic and Christian terms (eg. that Islam derives from Sanskrit "Ishalayam" meaning 'temple of God' and similar.

He alleges that the Kaaba in Mecca was originally a shrine to Shiva and that the Papacy was "a Vedic priesthood" until Constantine the Great killed the "Vedic Pope" and replaced him with the head of the hitherto unimportant Christian sect.

The South African Young Men's Muslim Association published an article written by the Mujlisul Ulama, a council of Islamic scholars, to refute Oak's Islam thesis.

Bibliography

  • Christianity is Chrisn-nity,
  • Islamic Havoc in India (A. Ghosh Publisher, 5740 W. Little York, Houston, Texas, 77091)
  • The Taj Mahal Is a Temple Place (Alternate title, The Taj Mahal is a Hindu Palace, Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • Who Says Akbar Was Great? (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • Agra Red Fort is a Hindu Building (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • Some Missing Chapters of World History (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • World Vedic Heritage -- A History of Histories (Hindi Sahitya Sadan, New Delhi)
  • Taj Mahal — The True Story (ISBN 0-9611614-4-2)

Notes

  1. Oak's account of his own life
  2. Narasimhan Ram, editor of The Hindu newspaper, calls him a "Sangh historian" HRD Ministry - its master's voice, The Hindu, April 29, 2001.
  3. Akbar S. Ahmed (May 1993). "The Taj Mahal". History Today, vol. 43. The Taj has recently entered a controversy which reflects the politics of modern India. Hindu fundamentalists, wishing to deny any positive role of Muslims in India, argue that it was not built by Shah Jahan. They claim Hindu rulers in the fourth century built it. Books with titles such as Taj Mahal Was a Rajput Palace (P.N. Oak, 1965) further argue this position. There is no merit in the argument, but it has acquired something of a popular following in India.
  4. The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture: The Indo-Aryan Migration Debate, Edwin Bryant, 2003
  5. Rebecca Brown, Lagaan: Once Upon a Time in India Film & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Film and Television Studies 34.1 (2004) 78-80
  6. ^ The Tajmahal is Tejomahalay—A Hindu Temple
  7. Cities And Regions Since
  8. Carl W. Ernst, Annemarie Schimmel (1992). Eternal Garden: Mysticism, History, and Politics at a South Asian Sufi Center. State University of New York Press. p. 36.
  9. OUTSIDER AS ENEMY: POLITICS OF REWRTING HISTORY IN INDIA, address to the Stanford India Association. Text available on the Internet Archives
  10. Raychaudhuri, T. (2000). "Shadows of the Swastika: Historical Perspectives on the Politics of Hindu Communalism". Modern Asian Studies. 34 (02): 259–279. doi:10.1017/S0026749X00003310.
  11. "The question of The Taj" in "Itihas Patrika, Vol. 5 1985"
  12. Muslim Digest, July to Oct. 1986 pages 23-24; Purushottam Nagesh Oak, Indian Kshatriyas Once Ruled from Bali to Baltic & Korea to Kaba (1966)
  13. Stephen Knapp, Proof of Vedic Culture's Global Existence (2001), ISBN 0961741066, p. 123f.
  14. Was the Kaaba Originally a Hindu Temple? by P.N. Oak
  15. Oak, P.N. (1999-06-04). "Cities And Regions Since". Vaishnava News Network. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. Mujlisul Ulema (Port Elizabeth), P.N. Oak's blasphemy against the Ka`bah, Young Men's Muslim Association, South Africa, archived text

External links

Categories: