| Revision as of 12:14, 14 July 2008 editNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits +afd2 | Revision as of 12:16, 14 July 2008 edit undoNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|}} | ||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical pederastic couples}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical pederastic couples}}</ul></div> | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 14 July 2008
Historical pederastic couples
AfDs for this article:- Historical pederastic couples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article began its life as a list, but has over time become the storinghouse for any uncited claim of any person in history whom any editor wants to claim was involved in pederasty. In a number of cases (e.g. Leonardo DaVinci and Bernard Montgomery, 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein), material appears in this omnibus which has been roundly rejected from the main article, thus turning this list into a de-facto POV WP:FORK. Lastly, the decision for this to be a list, rather than a category (which might be defensible) smacks of original research: the desire to synthesize and publish original commentary on Misplaced Pages, which violates WP:NOR.
This article was nominated for deletion a couple of years ago, but the discussion surrounding it was very lightweight, on both sides of the issue. I'm hoping this nomination will get a bit more serious attention and thorough discussion. Nandesuka (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Categories: