Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flowerparty: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:17, 4 September 2005 editHydnjo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,036 edits Misplaced Pages widow← Previous edit Revision as of 23:15, 5 September 2005 edit undoCjmarsicano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,421 edits Misplaced Pages widowNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


::That's what I thought but ] seems to think otherwise. As an Admim I suppose his view trumps ours. BTW, thanks for your astute vote, I was just feeling whimsical at the moment and wasn't trying to inrtroduce a new phrase into our vocabulary (neologisms are not allowed). ] ] 23:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC) ::That's what I thought but ] seems to think otherwise. As an Admim I suppose his view trumps ours. BTW, thanks for your astute vote, I was just feeling whimsical at the moment and wasn't trying to inrtroduce a new phrase into our vocabulary (neologisms are not allowed). ] ] 23:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
==Template:MikeWatt==
Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. ] 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:15, 5 September 2005

Archive: May 27 – August 25, 2005

Misplaced Pages widow

As the author and after further reflection under more sober circumstances I have tagged this article for speedy deletion as I believe it meets the criterion of General article 7 (1.2.7) at WP:CSD. hydnjo talk 20:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Since you're the only author, and you've explained yourself reasonably, I don't think there'll be any problem there. Flowerparty 20:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
That's what I thought but Ryan Delaney seems to think otherwise. As an Admim I suppose his view trumps ours. BTW, thanks for your astute vote, I was just feeling whimsical at the moment and wasn't trying to inrtroduce a new phrase into our vocabulary (neologisms are not allowed). hydnjo talk 23:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Template:MikeWatt

Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. Cjmarsicano 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)