| Revision as of 23:15, 5 September 2005 editCjmarsicano (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,421 edits →Misplaced Pages widow← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:26, 5 September 2005 edit undoFlowerparty (talk | contribs)14,828 edits →Template:MikeWatt: I replied at Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion#Template:MikeWattNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ==Template:MikeWatt== | ==Template:MikeWatt== | ||
| Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. ] 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. ] 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :I replied at ]. ]] 23:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:26, 5 September 2005
Archive: May 27 – August 25, 2005
Misplaced Pages widow
As the author and after further reflection under more sober circumstances I have tagged this article for speedy deletion as I believe it meets the criterion of General article 7 (1.2.7) at WP:CSD. hydnjo talk 20:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Since you're the only author, and you've explained yourself reasonably, I don't think there'll be any problem there. Flowerparty 20:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- That's what I thought but Ryan Delaney seems to think otherwise. As an Admim I suppose his view trumps ours. BTW, thanks for your astute vote, I was just feeling whimsical at the moment and wasn't trying to inrtroduce a new phrase into our vocabulary (neologisms are not allowed). hydnjo talk 23:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Template:MikeWatt
Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. Cjmarsicano 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)