Misplaced Pages

User talk:Gorgonzilla: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:23, 4 September 2005 editKyle Andrew Brown (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,753 edits Covers← Previous edit Revision as of 00:20, 6 September 2005 edit undoErwin Walsh (talk | contribs)497 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:



== possible project == == possible project ==
Line 31: Line 30:


Couple posters battling use of Economist Cover. Is if fair use? I see Time everywhere with disclaimers it is... but I dont know. Thanks.] 05:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Couple posters battling use of Economist Cover. Is if fair use? I see Time everywhere with disclaimers it is... but I dont know. Thanks.] 05:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

==Your Email==

"If you think about it, shit pushing is no less noble than vaginal penetration, except that it involves feces. Do you enjoy anal?"

No.

Revision as of 00:20, 6 September 2005

possible project

Would you like to work on The Clinton Chronicles?

Fair Use

BTW can you tell at afp.com http://www.afp.com/english/links/?pid=copyright&item=3 they have fair use of photos. I cant understand what they say. I want to use a photo of Bush on Air Force One looking at New Orleans.

I think this is the relevant copyright disclaimer as it is for AFP proper and not the RSS feed. I would be inclined to think it falls under Template:Copyrighted, however, that means you can't upload it since this is after May 19, 2005 so they will be deleting things. So, I doubt it can be used, but, if I find out anything further I will tell you. gren グレン 19:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
It might fall under Template:PermissionAndFairUse (you would have to link the AFP copyright page) since GFDL would govern third party aspects of this since it's a non-commercial license? I'm really not sure... but, I'm sure someone here knows.... gren グレン 19:52, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
I just saw Template:Verifieduse which leads you to Misplaced Pages:Fair use. You may be able to get the image approval there, since it's a fair use verification system apparently. gren グレン 19:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Kyle_Andrew_Brown"

Current Event Sept 1

Please look at Mr. Billions deletion of Bush's interview and plans.Kyle Andrew Brown 20:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism

I went in to revert Erwin Walsh's sockpuppet template in anon 172 userpage and saw you got there first. Just so you know, I don't agree with userpage vandalism, but the sockpuppet accusation is probably correct, except stating that User:Hipocrite is the main account was wrong. Anon 172 is a long standing troll I have been dealing with for months and his most recent vandalism in talk pages associated with the Hurricane Katrina situation was what got my ire: Although slight...I have a zero tolerance threshold for anyone violating those particular articles.--MONGO 20:11, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

Excuse me? Are you accusing me of vandalizing Hurricane Katrina? Hipocrite - «Talk» 03:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Attack Mode

Just a heads up, he's arrived at Hurricane Katrina...

Hurricane Katrina

Couple posters battling use of Economist Cover. Is if fair use? I see Time everywhere with disclaimers it is... but I dont know. Thanks.Kyle Andrew Brown 05:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Your Email

"If you think about it, shit pushing is no less noble than vaginal penetration, except that it involves feces. Do you enjoy anal?"

No.