| Revision as of 03:33, 6 September 2005 edit70.92.98.35 (talk) Roberrt Johson← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:41, 6 September 2005 edit undoFlowerparty (talk | contribs)14,828 edits re, moved new talk to bottomNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ⚫ | ==Robert Johnson== | ||
| ⚫ | sorry for not returning your mesage earlier, sorry if I came off mean by editing your "Clapton's band" part but I thought that you meant like most ignorant people do that Clapton was the leader of the band, you understand that wasn't true as you stated its like Ringo Starr's band The Beatles, sorry for the misunderstanding but now that its so long but I nor you have touched the the page of Johnson so I don't really think it mattered much to you or me so I'm glad there was no editing war. I think we should just let the article stand as it is and just leave it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks, Patman2648 | ||
| ==Misplaced Pages widow== | ==Misplaced Pages widow== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
| Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. ] 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. ] 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :I replied at ]. ]] 23:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | :I replied at ]. ]] 23:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ==Robert Johnson== | ||
| ⚫ | sorry for not returning your mesage earlier, sorry if I came off mean by editing your "Clapton's band" part but I thought that you meant like most ignorant people do that Clapton was the leader of the band, you understand that wasn't true as you stated its like Ringo Starr's band The Beatles, sorry for the misunderstanding but now that its so long but I nor you have touched the the page of Johnson so I don't really think it mattered much to you or me so I'm glad there was no editing war. I think we should just let the article stand as it is and just leave it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks, Patman2648 | ||
| :Hey, I'd completely forgotten. But yeah, I'm happy to leave it as it is. Thanks. ]] 03:41, 6 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:41, 6 September 2005
Archive: May 27 – August 25, 2005
Misplaced Pages widow
As the author and after further reflection under more sober circumstances I have tagged this article for speedy deletion as I believe it meets the criterion of General article 7 (1.2.7) at WP:CSD. hydnjo talk 20:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Since you're the only author, and you've explained yourself reasonably, I don't think there'll be any problem there. Flowerparty 20:56, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- That's what I thought but Ryan Delaney seems to think otherwise. As an Admim I suppose his view trumps ours. BTW, thanks for your astute vote, I was just feeling whimsical at the moment and wasn't trying to inrtroduce a new phrase into our vocabulary (neologisms are not allowed). hydnjo talk 23:14, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Template:MikeWatt
Instead of suggesting that the template be deleted, why wasn't I asked to edit it down? I attempted to do but someone reverted it back to its "unmanageable" format. Needless to say, I am not amused. Cjmarsicano 23:15, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- I replied at Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion#Template:MikeWatt. Flowerparty 23:26, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Robert Johnson
sorry for not returning your mesage earlier, sorry if I came off mean by editing your "Clapton's band" part but I thought that you meant like most ignorant people do that Clapton was the leader of the band, you understand that wasn't true as you stated its like Ringo Starr's band The Beatles, sorry for the misunderstanding but now that its so long but I nor you have touched the the page of Johnson so I don't really think it mattered much to you or me so I'm glad there was no editing war. I think we should just let the article stand as it is and just leave it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Thanks, Patman2648
- Hey, I'd completely forgotten. But yeah, I'm happy to leave it as it is. Thanks. Flowerparty 03:41, 6 September 2005 (UTC)