| Revision as of 22:44, 21 July 2008 editСанта Клаус (talk | contribs)Rollbackers213 edits more← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 21 July 2008 edit undoRodhullandemu (talk | contribs)115,150 edits →User:Azdpetratarawsanata: re blocksNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| :::Per ] I've blocked the first four indef as sockpuppets, at least of each other. What will be interesting is to see whether the IP autoblock has any effect on ]. Watch this space. --]] 15:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | :::Per ] I've blocked the first four indef as sockpuppets, at least of each other. What will be interesting is to see whether the IP autoblock has any effect on ]. Watch this space. --]] 15:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I've added 2 more. Maybe a cu is justified if my talk gets more. I don't think they belong to Stayfi (who used the above ips); they belong to another disgruntled user at ar wp. ] (]) 22:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | ::::I've added 2 more. Maybe a cu is justified if my talk gets more. I don't think they belong to Stayfi (who used the above ips); they belong to another disgruntled user at ar wp. ] (]) 22:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Also blocked for disruption/username issues. Stafyi doesn't seem to be caught in the autoblock, but then I'd guess these are going to be dynamic IPs. However, the message needs to be loud and clear that this is an inappropriate venue for their complaints, which should be in English anyway. --]] 23:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ;Comments | ;Comments | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 21 July 2008
User:Azdpetratarawsanata
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
- Suspected sockpuppets
Azdpetratarawsanata (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Petrasantatarawnazdy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Tarawazdypetrasanta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
AzTarPeCah (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Knyac (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Grammar Cahta (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Stayfi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by Санта Клаус (talk) 19
- 25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
Three sock puppets courtesy of the Arabic Misplaced Pages. Participated in edit warring the article. The owner is too limited to come up with better usernames (being a sockpuppet he thinks some established users on ar wp belong to the same user which explains the anthological usernames). Санта Клаус (talk) 19:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- All the above editors persist in adding the same WP:SOAPBOX comments into the article which are identical in wording. I have fully protected the article for a week and am wondering whether a checkuser might be indicated to see if they are editing from the same location. Stayfi is the most persistent and I suspect he's the sockmaster. --Rodhullandemu 04:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Without cu the first 4 are socks. If a cu is to be run please check Stayfi against 82.101.143.211 and 82.101.143.215 who also participated in editing the same article. Note Stayfi's denial. Thanks. Санта Клаус (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Per WP:DUCK I've blocked the first four indef as sockpuppets, at least of each other. What will be interesting is to see whether the IP autoblock has any effect on Stayfi. Watch this space. --Rodhullandemu 15:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've added 2 more. Maybe a cu is justified if my talk gets more. I don't think they belong to Stayfi (who used the above ips); they belong to another disgruntled user at ar wp. Санта Клаус (talk) 22:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also blocked for disruption/username issues. Stafyi doesn't seem to be caught in the autoblock, but then I'd guess these are going to be dynamic IPs. However, the message needs to be loud and clear that this is an inappropriate venue for their complaints, which should be in English anyway. --Rodhullandemu 23:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've added 2 more. Maybe a cu is justified if my talk gets more. I don't think they belong to Stayfi (who used the above ips); they belong to another disgruntled user at ar wp. Санта Клаус (talk) 22:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Per WP:DUCK I've blocked the first four indef as sockpuppets, at least of each other. What will be interesting is to see whether the IP autoblock has any effect on Stayfi. Watch this space. --Rodhullandemu 15:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Without cu the first 4 are socks. If a cu is to be run please check Stayfi against 82.101.143.211 and 82.101.143.215 who also participated in editing the same article. Note Stayfi's denial. Thanks. Санта Клаус (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Conclusions