Revision as of 16:20, 25 July 2008

Template:Moveprotected

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Violations

Please place new reports at the BOTTOM. If you do not see your report, you can search the archives for it.

User:InternetHero reported by User:Wolfkeeper (Result: ?)

• Three-revert rule violation on Internal combustion engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

InternetHero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: - (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 00:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

User has returned from ban, the previous report is still on this page, and within some hours has started reverting/edit warring again. (FWIW: I didn't do the intermediate revert- User:UB65 did so, completely unprompted from me, either on or off wiki.)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert: 2008-07-21T18:39:40
• 2nd revert: 2008-07-19T22:41:38
• 3rd revert: 2008-07-19T19:09:01
• 4th revert: 2008-07-19T04:11:05
• 5th revert: 2008-07-18T23:16:23

(Note User was suspended for 24 hours, which explains the gap, and note that user was not logged in in the 5th example but he's admitted it was him: 'friend's IP'- but it's obvious from context anyway.)

• Diff of 3RR warning: 2008-07-01T15:55:34
• No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Stifle (talk) 08:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: - There were 4 reverts from the 18th at 23:16 to the 19th at 22:41. This is 4 reverts within a 24 hour period. However, this is complaint is now stale. DigitalC (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:CrazyCats60201 reported by User:Madcoverboy (Result: No violation)

• Three-revert rule violation on Northwestern University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

CrazyCats60201‎ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 04:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:
• CrazyCats60201 repeatedly reverts existing and new images to: Northwestern Universty Rock.jpg
• I subsequently uploaded a new image (University Hall and the Rock.jpg) created by myself in good faith attempt to improve upon previous image (Northwestern-Rock.JPG). This new image was likewise reverted by CrazyCats60201.

• 1st revert: 17:08, 21 July 2008 (Uploads Northwestern Universty Rock.jpg)
• 2nd revert: 17:28, 21 July 2008 (Reverts again to Northwestern Universty Rock.jpg)
• 3rd revert: 18:21, 21 July 2008 (Reverts new image - University Hall and the Rock.jpg - introduced by me to Northwestern Universty Rock.jpg)
• 4th revert: 22:43, 21 July 2008

• Diff of 3RR warning: 21:54, 21 July 2008
• No violation The first quoted revert is not actually a revert because it introduces new content. The new image was uploaded three minutes before that edit. A revert constitutes undoing the edits of other users — making a new edit does not count. Stifle (talk) 08:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Point taken. Nevertheless, there have since been 3 reversions since then, including after a warning. Madcoverboy (talk) 15:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

92.12.76.4 reported by Bzuk (Result: 1 month)

• Three-revert rule violation on Marlon Brando (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by 92.12.76.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 14:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

• Diff of 3RR warning:

Note that this appears to be Harvey Carter, a previously banned editor who, despite some good intentions expressed on the user talk page, has continued to editwar with a number of editors and has now extended the 3R into more reverts and is still at it. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC).

Blocked – for a period of 1 month See User talk:92.12.76.4 where this IP editor admits he is a sock of a banned user, most likely User:HarveyCarter. See also an earlier SSP and a checkuser from 2007. EdJohnston (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

User:87.198.252.66 reported by User:Domer48 (Result: 72 hours)

• Three-revert rule violation on Kevin Barry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

87.198.252.66 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 20:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to: 14:30, 15 May 2008

• 1st revert: 19:40, 22 July 2008
• 2nd revert: 19:46, 22 July 2008
• 3rd revert: 19:53, 22 July 2008
• 4th revert: 20:00, 22 July 2008

• Diff of 3RR warning: 19:58, 22 July 2008

Editor has previously been blocked for disruption on this same issue before, see 87.198.141.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 89.100.137.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Domer48_'fenian' 20:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Three IPs who are probably the same person have all violated policy on Kevin Barry. EdJohnston (talk) 01:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:93.107.64.86 reported by User:CarterBar (Result: IP Range Blocked for Six Months)

• Three-revert rule violation on Insular G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

93.107.64.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 20:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:
• 5th revert:

• Diff of 3RR warning:

IP is banned User:Gold heart. Can an IP range block be applied. He can change his IP within the range 93.107 at will.

• Range block the whole of Ireland over 2 words? 93.107.64.86 (talk) 20:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Alison, a CheckUser has stated that despite Gold heart claiming that this is the whole of Ireland, that Gold heart is the only user on that /16, and ok'd a range block if he continued to evade his ban. (diff of alison's statement is here) SirFozzie (talk) 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Over two words, SirFoz? 93.107.134.96 (talk) 23:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

In agreement on range-block. GoodDay (talk) 23:43, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

This banned user is disrupting numerous articles and talkpages. TharkunColl (talk) 23:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

If WP wants to rangeblock the whole of Ireland over two words, it might be interesting to some people. 93.107.134.96 (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. As said previously, by CheckUsers, the rangeblock is the whole of Gold heart, not of Ireland.) SirFozzie (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

over one policy, Gold heart. WP:BAN SirFozzie (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

By the way, when does this range block take effect? Gold heart is now vandalizing User:TharkunColl's page. GoodDay (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Should be in effect now. SirFozzie (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Badagnani reported by User:Magioladitis (Result: 72 hours)

• Three-revert rule violation on Tan Kai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Badagnani (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 20:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to: VERSIONTIME

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:

• Diff of 3RR warning: DIFFTIME

• Comment - This was an undoing on my part of a mistaken category removal. The individual Tan Kai was born ca. 1973, but the year and date of birth is unknown. Thus, the category was quite correct.

After each of my restorations of the proper cat, I wrote to the editor who had removed it and left clear edit summaries stating that it was a properly placed category and should not be removed; however, that editor chose to engage, aggressively and without response, in reverting my correct restoration of the proper cat each time. Thus, the report is illogical 1) because the editor's edits were admittedly incorrect, and 2) because the reporting editor reverted his/her mistaken edits the same number of times, even after having been informed at least five times that his/her edits were mistakes (i.e., the removal of an accurately placed category). Badagnani (talk) 20:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Decision: The reported user was clearly edit warring although they have only reverted 3 times. I have blocked for 72 hours due to their fairly extensive history of blocks for edit warring, including two recent ones (the first of these two recent blocks was eventually reverted due to staleness of the request, but not due to an apparent lack of edit warring). TigerShark (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

User:62.65.239.189 reported by User:206.186.8.130 (Result: 24 hours)

• Three-revert rule violation on Estonian War of Independence‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

62.65.239.189 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 20:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• 1st revert: 18:15, 22 July 2008
• 2nd revert: 18:27, 22 July 2008
• 3rd revert: 18:30, 22 July 2008
• 4th revert: 20:06, 22 July 2008
• 5th revert: 20:39, 22 July 2008

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EdJohnston (talk) 02:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:62.65.239.189 reported by User:206.186.8.130 (Result: Already blocked)

• Three-revert rule violation on Alexander Dyukov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

62.65.239.189 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 206.186.8.130 (talk) 21:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• 1st revert: 18:19, 22 July 2008
• 2nd revert: 18:27, 22 July 2008
• 3rd revert: 20:09, 22 July 2008
• 4th revert: 20:40, 22 July 2008

Already blocked EdJohnston (talk) 02:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Birthplace of Marco Polo (Result: Malformed report)

I don't know if this is the proper place, because this is not a classic 3RR violation. I was adding edits to Birthplace of Marco Polo, but two Croatian users revert my edits. Despite I'm new in English wiki, I was already present in the Italian wiki, and I've alredy read En. wiki. so I had the chance to know about user:DIREKTOR and User:Zenanarh. This two problematic users often act together when a 3d revert is necessary, as in the present case. I am open to discussion in the talkpage. I'm sure I did errors! But the two allied users can't revert me, to force me to explain even evident things. I've asked them to re-correct my edits to point out the disputed claims, but they refused. They refuse to tell me where I am wrong! They just revert me! I ask the restoration of my version. I will give to the two user the time to correct just the disputed claim of my version. That seems me a correct agreement.

• 1st revert
• 2nd revert
• 3d revert

Marco Pagot (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. We would expect to see a much more thorough discussion at Talk:Birthplace of Marco Polo before we would review this as a case of edit warring. Your only contribution to the talk page so far is a personal attack on the other editors. When we see contentious editing on pages about Italian/Croatian issues by brand-new editors, we do keep in mind a previous sockpuppet case. Please consider giving a pointer to your Italian Misplaced Pages username on your user page. EdJohnston (talk) 23:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Ausonia reported by User:Troy 07 (Result: No Action )

• Three-revert rule violation on Roman Catholic Suburbicarian Diocese of Albano‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Ausonia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: ~ Troy (talk) 23:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:

• Diff of 3RR warning:

No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria.--KojiDude 00:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

But it's a sockpuppet. Take a look at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/200.215.40.3. It was trying to continue yesterday's revert-warring using a different identity—first as an IP, then Italicus, and now this. What now? ~ Troy (talk) 00:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Report the sockpuppeting to a different board (WP:ANI) or request a checkuser. There may be a blockable offense, but not for 3RR. You'll have to find the apporpriate place to report, or personally contact an admin.--KojiDude 00:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Krzyzowiec reported by User:M0RD00R (Result: 4 days)

• Three-revert rule violation on Far right in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Krzyzowiec (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 23:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert: 01:29, 23 July 2008.
• 2nd revert: 02:26, 23 July 2008
• 3rd revert: 02:29, 23 July 2008
• 4th revert: 02:35, 23 July 2008

• Diff of 3RR warning: .

This user was blocked for disruptive edit warring before , so he knows the rules. Some history of related incidents ,. --- M0RD00R (talk) 23:47, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 4 days Due to this violation, in the light of a lengthy block history. EdJohnston (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Troy 07 reported by User:Ausonia (Result: Protected)

• Three-revert rule violation on Roman Catholic Suburbicarian Diocese of Albano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Troy 07 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: Ausonia (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Ausonia (talk) 00:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I disagree. The first one was your edit. ~ Troy (talk) 00:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

As well, there is evidence that charges you of being a sockpuppet. You ignored it. ~ Troy (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Page protected Three days. Any sockpuppet charges should be filed at WP:SSP. Editors who continue to revert after protection expires may be sanctioned. EdJohnston (talk) 01:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Troy 07 reported by User:Ausonia (Result: Protected)

• Three-revert rule violation on Odoardo Farnese (cardinal) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Troy 07 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: Ausonia (talk) 00:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Ausonia (talk) 00:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Page protected Three days. Editors who continue to revert after protection expires may be sanctioned. EdJohnston (talk) 01:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Bedford reported by User:Doncram (Result: Declined)

• Three-revert rule violation on Crawford-Gilpin House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Bedford (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

Time reported: 04:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

I have not reported 3RR violation before so am not sure i have done this right. Above, last, i am providing the last version that Bedford reverted to. I would prefer the article left at this version, which shows the cleanup tag that he disputes and which disqualifies it from DYK listing, which he had nominated it for, contrary to discussion of informal guidelines for very experienced editors of DYK articles. doncram (talk) 04:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Doncram has been harassing me for a month now, trying to torpedo my DYK noms. His adding that tag is done solely to vandalism it, so it'll be passed over for DYK consideration, as its his form of a temper tantrum as I am not catering to his whims. He has tried similar measures to torpedo other noms I've made this month, but so far he has not succeeded. This is the furthest he has gone. Some have requested that he no longer evaluates my submissions, but he has ignored them. Aside a token edit or two, the large majority of his edits to the Template Talk page for DYK have been to torpedo me. I can no longer AGF as far as Doncram is concerned; he's even driven me from the NRHP Wikiproject, as I am tired of his childishness.--Bedford 04:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Bedford misrepresents. There was one mild suggestion by Daniel Case that i not review his DYK nominations, which i discussed openly at Misplaced Pages talk:Did you know#DYK is rotten, drop the bad NRHP articles, and to date no one else has commented as Bedford suggests. Other comments there and elsewhere, in since-deleted discussions of individual DYK nominations at DYK, have been more against Bedford's churlish and abusive behavior. I have let many of Bedford's DYK noms go by, but the display of these on the front page of Misplaced Pages, with him claiming credit on his DYK medals page, offends me, when he discards reasonable feedback. It is fair to say that his articles are plagiarized -- defined as giving less than adequate credit for the author(s) of the main source, the NRHP nomination, that he often relies upon. They do not reflect well for Misplaced Pages on the mainpage. doncram (talk) 05:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing reasonable about your feedback You are doing the misrepreenting. I have not plagiarized a thing; all are sourced. You are just craving attention. I have filed a RfC against you.--Bedford 05:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment. Bedford is an admin and should know this stuff. I left a note for User:Bedford that he is over 3RR; I recommend that he self-revert. His vandalism defence does not work; read WP:3RR for where the removal of tags is discussed. Since I have no more time today to wait for an answer, I'm leaving this issue for the next 3RR closer to deal with. Normally there would be a block, but an RFC/U could be a more logical place to air out the issue. EdJohnston (talk) 05:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Doncram should know this as well, but yet he gets away with his harassment against me. I put the tag where it has previously gone on similar articles, which is more then it deserves. It need not be on top. I've compromised, which is far more than Doncram has.--Bedford 05:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

• Declined While Bedford has violated 3RR (only reverts of simple and obvious vandalism are exempt, and saying something is vandalism doesn't make it so), I think this report is made in bad faith, mainly based on the diff where Doncram added the tag to start with. Stifle (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:InternetHero reported by User:DigitalC (Result: Page protected, user blocked)

• Three-revert rule violation on Telescope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

InternetHero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 00:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert: 22:03 22 July
• 2nd revert: 02:11 23 July
• 3rd revert: 04:55 23 July
• 4th revert: 17:47 23 July

• Previous block within last week for edit warring:
• Diff of 3RR warning:
• Previous 3RR report since his recent block

• This is my first 3RR report, so hopefully it is formatted correctly. Please note that I am involved, as I have reverted one of his edits. - DigitalC (talk) 00:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 72 hours, In strong consideration of his other 3 3RR blocks in the past, it is clear to me that this particular user is familiar with when and how the 3RR is enforced and how it is violated by reverts. Although the warning here was placed before a day or so before he actually violated the 3RR, I shall carry less leniency since, as before, he should know the course of action and procedure involved; he violated it less than 4 days ago on another article. The extension of the block period was inline with policy as described here. The page has also been protected for 5 days and all changes must be formed by consensus on the talk page. Rudget 12:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Raymond Cruise reported by User:Mr Wesker (Result: Decline )

• Three-revert rule violation on Málaga CF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Raymond Cruise (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 12:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to: ]

• 1st revert: 12:05 22 July
• 2nd revert: 18:13 23 July
• 3rd revert: 10:05 24 July

• This is my first 3RR report, so hopefully it is formatted correctly. Please note that I am involved, as I have reverted one of his edits. - (12:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC))
• No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Rudget 12:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Hillock65 reported by User:Kuban kazak (Result: 48 hour block and warn )

• Three-revert rule violation on Ukrainians in Russia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views).

Hillock65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Time reported: 14:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to: 03:13, 24 June 2008

• 1st revert: 16:39, 23 July 2008
• 2nd revert: 14:02, 24 July 2008
• 3rd revert: 14:09, 24 July 2008
• 4th revert: 14:43, 24 July 2008

• Diff of 3RR warning: User well aware of 3rr, previously blocked for it, also please note of the uncivil and rude comments in the reverts. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 14:50, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, ban me, if I violated anything, but please also look at --Kuban Cossack's edit warring in two different articles and that is less than a month that he got banned for edit warring. Why is it that a persistent edit warrior with one of the longest record of offences gets away with continuous edit warring for so long?! --Hillock65 (talk) 14:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Result - I have blocked Hillock for 48 hours and warned Kuban. Scarian 15:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

User:GreenEcho reported by User:Emilyzilch (Result: 24 hours)

• WP:3RR vio on Al-Hakim bi-Amr Allah

GreenEcho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Time reported: 22:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Previous version reverted to:

There are intermediate version, but the reverts are rolled back to User:GreenEcho's added statement. A related conflict by the same user (at the time, an IP only) led to the locking of Druze, which remains locked after a month of his continued refusal to participate. User will not discuss or compromise and simply reverts. He is well aware of Misplaced Pages, using complex syntax, user and talk pages, (inappropriate) use of user warning templates and user-conflict administrative pages (he has personal conflict with another user, User:Hiram111).

• 1st revert: 13:57, 2008 July 23
• 2nd revert: 19:16, 2008 July 23
• 3rd revert: 11:14, 2008 July 24
• 4th revert: 14:00, 2008 July 24

Note The last revert was 3 minutes off from being a violation. No diff of a 3RR Warning has been given. --KojiDude 22:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment. GreenEcho's first edit was 30 June but there are signs that this is an experienced editor. He showed up at WP:ANI on his second day of editing. His user page suggests he has been an IP before. Both Emilyzilch and GreenEcho seem to have a lot of technical knowledge, but GreenEcho and the IPs he used previously have been very combative on more than one article. I am notifying him of this report. EdJohnston (talk) 23:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The dispute is related to Druze which is awaiting RFC. Please, look at the edits before talking about 3RR. Emilyzilch has been removing sourced edits, reverting his/her edits is enforcing Misplaced Pages policy. GreenEcho (talk) 23:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

User:GreenEcho has reverted the page again. Your sourced edits are inappropriately added to the introduction and you routinely suppress other points of view - which you will note I have not, rather reserving controversy to the body of the articles. Naahid بنت الغلان 23:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

== ] 
reported by ] (Result: ) ==
*] violation on {{Article|<!-- Place name of Article here -->}}. 
{{3RRV|<!--Place Name of 3RR "violator" here-->}} 
Time reported: ~~~~~
*Previous version reverted to:  <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->
<!--For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to. 
The previous version reverted to must be from BEFORE all the reverting started. -->
<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. 
See Help:Diff or Misplaced Pages:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->
*1st revert: 
*2nd revert: 
*3rd revert: 
*4th revert: 
*Diff of 3RR warning: 

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring