| Revision as of 18:03, 29 July 2008 editDomer48 (talk | contribs)16,098 edits →report: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:40, 29 July 2008 edit undo81.149.73.79 (talk) →Sockpuppetry case: got rid of stupid comments by some paranoid personNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == report == | == report == | ||
| ==] case== | |||
| {| align="left" | |||
| || ] | |||
| |} | |||
| You have been accused of ]. Please refer to ] for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ] before editing the evidence page. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 18:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:40, 29 July 2008
April 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ulster Defence Regiment. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 15:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 15:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
UDR
With regard to this edit, I think you'll find someone removes it and tried to warn you again as above. You need to give it in line references for it to remain in the article. If you have a reference after the sentence put <ref> then your reference then </ref>. Roy Beggs is a good article to show you how to do that.Traditional unionist (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's advisable. Make sure you can stand over every edit with references. Controversial edits need to be stood over with reliable sources, google is good for that. Don't be afraid to use google scholar and books too. Good luck, and register a user name!Traditional unionist (talk) 14:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep your personal information private and you'll keep your identity private. But I can't blame you.Traditional unionist (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think I see you trying to use a reference twice without linking twice. It's possible using the <ref name="something"/> tags. Take a look at the article on the Enniskillen Bomb to see how it's done in practise.Traditional unionist (talk) 15:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Keep your personal information private and you'll keep your identity private. But I can't blame you.Traditional unionist (talk) 15:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)