| Revision as of 23:32, 8 September 2005 editBeland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators236,679 edits See also Scientific misconduct, Journalism scandals← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 8 September 2005 edit undoBeland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators236,679 edits Category:Ethics, Category:ScandalsNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * ''Compare'': ], ], ] | * ''Compare'': ], ], ] | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| {{philo-stub}} | {{philo-stub}} | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 8 September 2005
Intellectual dishonesty is the creation of misleading impressions through the use of rhetoric, logical fallacy, fraud, or misrepresented evidence. It may stem from an ulterior motive, haste, sloppiness, or external pressure to reach a certain conclusion. The unwary reader may be deceived as a result.
Scientists and scholars generally consider plagiarism a serious form of intellectual dishonesty. Other examples include the incorrect attribution of a quotation or quotation out of context, use of obfuscated or irrelevant citations, deceptive omission of contextual text through ellipsis, and the unsupported amplification of a relationship.
See also
- In specific fields: Scientific misconduct, Journalism scandals
- Some examples: Honesty, Ethics, Epistemic virtue
- Compare: Scientific skepticism, Scientism, rigour
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |