Misplaced Pages

User talk:130.101.152.83: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:33, 9 March 2008 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits Apologies for any disruption: be more careful← Previous edit Revision as of 16:50, 25 August 2008 edit undo130.101.20.152 (talk) Replaced content with 'This IP broke exactly _ZERO_ rules. Any sysop saying otherwise is making rules up on the spot. These rules ought to be listed here by these sysops.'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
This IP broke exactly _ZERO_ rules. Any sysop saying otherwise is making rules up on the spot. These rules ought to be listed here by these sysops.
{{sharedIPedu|the ]}}

==Email==

Can we be in touch by email?

Martin

==Block evidence==
I'm asking JzG for the evidence supporting this indef block. For log, see . It is also a shared IP. Also asking who he thinks this is. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 02:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
* It was not indefinite. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 12:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
**My error on that, sorry. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 20:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

== Unblock request ==

{{tlx|unblock|Insufficient evidence, block excesssive.}}

|Same user, different IP (probably) I use public computer terminals, and the IP changes every time you log in. I see no evidence of tendentious editing on EVP; I made almost no edits to the page. I also challenge JzG to say who he thinks I am.}}] (]) 19:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:A note- the University of Akron IPs are in the 130.101 range. I made a handful of edits to EVP; most were on the talk. The 130.101 IPs are me. ] (]) 19:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
{| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
|-
| valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ]
| style="padding: 0.1em" |

'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s):
<br><br>Evidence given for block lacking, and even if reasons given are true, no warnings were given and block is excessive.

''Request handled by:'' ] <small>]</small> 20:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
|}


:A note- the University of Akron IPs are in the 130.101 range. I made a handful of edits to EVP; most were on the talk. The 130.101 IPs are me. ] (]) 19:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
::I got an email that said JzG think I'm Tom Butler. I didn't know who that was, Google tells me he's director of AA-EVP. AA-EVP's has a PO BOX in Reno, NV. I'm in Akron, Ohio, as the IPs suggest. ] (]) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

== Apologies for any disruption ==

Same user, probably another IP. I apologize if I did anything disruptive here; most of my edits were on ] where I was simply suggesting how we might get it neutral enough to avoid future edit warring. I failed. I wasn't IP hopping on purpose. I sat down at a computer when I had the time. To try and give consistency I only edited from campus to keep the IPs in the same range. I don't know how AE works; I knew there was a case with SA involved, and I posted thinking it ''might'' be a concern. I said that at the beginning. My rant to Jeh was justified and I don't make any apologies for that. I did not, however, mean to evade a ban when I left that rant; I didn't know this IP was blocked at the time. Obviously, I can't keep track of all of the IPs in the UA range. I'm not going to edit any more, however. I wanted to avoid the mess of these paranormal articles and I got dragged in anyway. Hopefully the edit warring will stop; I doubt it will. ] (]) 20:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:] only works once...so be much more careful in the future, 130.xyz...read the ]. ] <small>]</small> 20:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:50, 25 August 2008

This IP broke exactly _ZERO_ rules. Any sysop saying otherwise is making rules up on the spot. These rules ought to be listed here by these sysops.