Misplaced Pages

Talk:Humanistic psychology: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:19, 20 September 2005 edit129.241.28.131 (talk) Re-edit← Previous edit Revision as of 20:47, 20 September 2005 edit undoJanice Rowe (talk | contribs)187 edits Re-edit: good work...Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


I have done a re-edit of the article, including the establishemnt of three main headlines. The article still needs a lot of work; more academic reference material, more elaboration of humanistic theory and epistemology. I hope to look into the matter soon. --] 14:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC) I have done a re-edit of the article, including the establishemnt of three main headlines. The article still needs a lot of work; more academic reference material, more elaboration of humanistic theory and epistemology. I hope to look into the matter soon. --] 14:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
:Good work! I may have some time to dedicate to this as well. --]

Revision as of 20:47, 20 September 2005

Examples of qualitative research are needed

Humanistic psychologists certainly do not use all the methods described as qualitative. Trontonian 03:47, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)

I added an article about qualitative psychological research and lnked to it. It's essentially a stub; I tried to be NPOV but it needs some contributions from people who are more involved in the topic than I. Trontonian 03:18, 1 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Re-edit

I have done a re-edit of the article, including the establishemnt of three main headlines. The article still needs a lot of work; more academic reference material, more elaboration of humanistic theory and epistemology. I hope to look into the matter soon. --Hawol 14:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Good work! I may have some time to dedicate to this as well. --Janice Rowe