| Revision as of 04:00, 6 September 2008 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,221 edits →September 2008: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:48, 7 September 2008 edit undoBentecbye (talk | contribs)186 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :I'm no Pabopa.You violated 3rr rule in ].--] (]) 10:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | :I'm no Pabopa.You violated 3rr rule in ].--] (]) 10:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == about kofun == | ||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ] You violated 3rr rule in ],], ] | |||
| You currently appear to be engaged in an ] according to the reverts. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors.--] (]) 09:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Caution for 3RR == | |||
| ] | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if:Gaya confederacy|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->--] (]) 03:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, sorry for my mistake with ], so I intend to give you a warning for the edit warring on the article. Regards.--] (]) 03:46, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :OK | |||
| ] | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if:Gaya confederacy|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--] (]) 03:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR report on you at ] == | |||
| You already got two warnings before you violate 3RR, but you violate the policy again along with {{User|Kuebie}} who are blocked for the same reason today. So I think you need a break as a consequence. Regards.--] (]) 20:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| :No, you did. That is essentially the same reverts based on your new addition. Kuebie's reverts are not exactly identical, but blocked for 3RR violation. Please read ]. Besides, you should be careful when making an edit. Please use talk pages rather than just making edit warrrings. Regards.--] (]) 20:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I don't violat 3rr rule.Is this revert? and Kuebie violat 3rr rule.I always use talk pages. --] (]) 20:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == 3rr rule == | |||
| ] You violated 3rr rule in ],], ],]. You currently appear to be engaged in an ] according to the reverts. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors.--] (]) 23:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| anyway, did you really read this (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)? this is not mean "In recent years,many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area." no sentence like your claim. are you make hoax?] (]) 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | anyway, did you really read this (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)? this is not mean "In recent years,many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area." no sentence like your claim. are you make hoax?] (]) 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 53: | Line 26: | ||
| On the contrary, this scholar claims that That is the korean kofun and spread to Japan. That is not a Japanese invneted kofun. but Japanese scholar opposed this theory. anywasy, that Kofun is not invented in Japan. if Japanese use "]", then ] invented in Japan? ] (]) 03:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | On the contrary, this scholar claims that That is the korean kofun and spread to Japan. That is not a Japanese invneted kofun. but Japanese scholar opposed this theory. anywasy, that Kofun is not invented in Japan. if Japanese use "]", then ] invented in Japan? ] (]) 03:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | It is explanation of one claim. Do not take up only one place.--] (]) 07:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == September 2008 == | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:24 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:Edit warring|'''Edit warring'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You are welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 04:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> Edit warring on ]. Per a report at ]. ] (]) 04:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:48, 7 September 2008
2008.8
1st of all, that is not a who kowtow page. 2nd, if you are not a sock of Pabopa, don't revert banned user's edit. if you are Pabopa, you are Banned edit in wikipedia.Manacpowers (talk) 09:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm no Pabopa.You violated 3rr rule in Kowtow.--Bentecbye (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
about kofun
anyway, did you really read this (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)? this is not mean "In recent years,many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area." no sentence like your claim. are you make hoax?Manacpowers (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Again, Your source is NOT mentioned that "many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in this area.". (韓国全羅道地方の前方後円墳調査)
frankly speaking, are you ret***? why you insert WRONG information by Unrelated Source? Manacpowers (talk) 03:31, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
are you liar?
- 韓国西南部の全羅南道から全羅北道にかけて、とくに栄山江流域を中心とする地域に分布している前方後円墳 many typical Japanese tumulus Kofun and jades was found in Jeolla.
korean source The Hankyoreh 2001.9.6--Bentecbye (talk) 03:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Wow. sorry. retar***. Your favored source said,] 古墳の近くには、3世紀以来築造された万家村古墳群がある。この古墳群は長方形ないし方台形の形状で周溝をもつのが特徴である。同じく周溝をもつ韓国の前方後円墳が、日本の前方後円墳に淵源をもつのではなく、韓半島独自の墓制として発展したとする学説の論拠になっている。
Your favored source do not say, that kofun invned in japan and spread to korea.Manacpowers (talk) 03:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
On the contrary, this scholar claims that That is the korean kofun and spread to Japan. That is not a Japanese invneted kofun. but Japanese scholar opposed this theory. anywasy, that Kofun is not invented in Japan. if Japanese use "Hanji", then Kanji invented in Japan? Manacpowers (talk) 03:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
It is explanation of one claim. Do not take up only one place.--Bentecbye (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2008 (UTC)