Revision as of 18:47, 10 September 2008 editRividian (talk | contribs)3,529 edits →Daddy's girl fetish: c← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 10 September 2008 edit undoAtomaton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,903 edits →Daddy's girl fetish: Merge into AgeplayNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*'''Delete''', then delete again. I don't even know where to begin. ] (]) 18:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', then delete again. I don't even know where to begin. ] (]) 18:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --] (]) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --] (]) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
*{{VoteDelete}} Should merge into ] with cleanup ] (]) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:03, 10 September 2008
Daddy's girl fetish
- Daddy's girl fetish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Attempts at finding reliable sources have failed, and reliable sources are unlikely to exist given the neologistic, marginal, idiosyncratic and sexual nature of the subject. By the same token; the subject's notability is absent, and therefore the article is unable to avoid the function of "advocacy". Redblueball (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, then delete again. I don't even know where to begin. Deltabeignet (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --Rividian (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Template:VoteDelete Should merge into Ageplay with cleanup Atom (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)