| Revision as of 19:10, 10 September 2008 editAtomaton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,903 editsm →Daddy's girl fetish: sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:23, 10 September 2008 edit undoGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,038 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under Sexuality and genderNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Delete''' due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --] (]) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --] (]) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *{{VoteDelete}} or {{VoteMerge}} into ] with cleanup ] (]) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | *{{VoteDelete}} or {{VoteMerge}} into ] with cleanup ] (]) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] (]) 19:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 19:23, 10 September 2008
Daddy's girl fetish
- Daddy's girl fetish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Attempts at finding reliable sources have failed, and reliable sources are unlikely to exist given the neologistic, marginal, idiosyncratic and sexual nature of the subject. By the same token; the subject's notability is absent, and therefore the article is unable to avoid the function of "advocacy". Redblueball (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, then delete again. I don't even know where to begin. Deltabeignet (talk) 18:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of sources. I don't really care what the subject of the article is, but I do care that there are no sources. I ran a few book searches I found nothing on this topic, just some psychology texts on non-sexual family roleplaying therapies. Reliable sources covering this fetish are needed, otherwise there's no evidence this is an encyclopedia article rather than original study of the hobby of random internet people. The former is good, the latter is not what Misplaced Pages is for. --Rividian (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Template:VoteDelete or Template:VoteMerge into Ageplay with cleanup Atom (talk) 19:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)