| Revision as of 23:12, 10 September 2008 editKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 edits rm← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:15, 10 September 2008 edit undoKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 edits ←Replaced content with '{{Archive}}'Next edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Archive}} |
|
<center><div style="background-color: #f0f0ff; border: none; padding: 5px; width: 750px;">Archives: ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']'''.</div></center> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hemshin peoples- Here we go again... == |
|
|
Hi Khoikhoi, |
|
|
|
|
|
Here we go again. Couple of hours after I have restored the article an anonymous user has reverted back again to the ancient version. I fear the cycle starts anew. What am I supposed to do? Any advice? Can you do something about it? Thanks. ] (]) 21:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for your interest Khoikhoi. ] (]) 20:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::'''Sorry to keep you engaged Khoikhoi''', but couple of hours after I have restored the article for the second time since unprotection, the User Namsos has affected a revert. This one is one of the previous four. I will restore the article again but I am nearly sure various identifiable users and anons will revert in turns. This is a clearly recognizable pattern as witnessed by the history of the article.] (]) 15:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Reply == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi! The site with the results of 2003 Abkhazian census also has the results of all other censuses, including the 1886 one so I've added this ref. |
|
|
|
|
|
There are two refs after the sentence 'Most of the Samurzaq'anians must be thought to have been Mingrelians, and a minority Abkhaz' - to the books by Mueller and by Cornell. I'm not sure since I don't have an access to these books now but I think that one of them was used as a source for that sentence (Mueller's one, maybe) and one for the 1886 data but was misplaced later for some reason. Could you check the book by Cornell for the 1886 census data? ]<sub>]</sub> 06:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Cyrus cylinder == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please see my request at ] before you dive into the article again. Thanks. -- ] (]) 08:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==On Pan-Arabism== |
|
|
It is more than obvious that the anti-jewish section is unencyclopedic. Here are some of the reasons:<br /><br /> |
|
|
1. The style is more of a news-flash.<br /> |
|
|
2. It contains information purely cited.<br /> |
|
|
3. It is a strong point of view pushover.<br /> |
|
|
4. There are some grammar mistakes and mistakes in punctuation. ( forgive me for mistakes in my own writing here)<br /> |
|
|
5. It seems like this section is not about anti-jewish racism but instead an attack on arabs.<br /> |
|
|
6. It contains dubious information that is apparently intended to misguide the reader.<br /> |
|
|
7. IT '''DOES NOT BELONG IN PAN-ARABISM'''<br /> |
|
|
<br /> |
|
|
] (]) 14:54, 10 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
