| Revision as of 03:34, 12 September 2008 editS Marshall (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers32,380 edits →Adam Internet← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:07, 13 September 2008 edit undoRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →Adam InternetNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ::*Article claims of the number of staff and customers it has doesn't make it notable. ] (]) 02:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ::*Article claims of the number of staff and customers it has doesn't make it notable. ] (]) 02:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :::*I don't get the objection to this article at all, then. Coverage in reliable sources is what makes something notable, and you agree in your nomination that Adam Internet has reliable sources. So what's the problem?--] ]/] 03:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | :::*I don't get the objection to this article at all, then. Coverage in reliable sources is what makes something notable, and you agree in your nomination that Adam Internet has reliable sources. So what's the problem?--] ]/] 03:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Keep''' but more work is needed--] (]) 01:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:07, 13 September 2008
Adam Internet
- Adam Internet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article has 3 reliable sources but the article fails to state notability. Bidgee (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep because the article claims the company has 100+ staff and 75,000+ customers; I think this constitutes an assertion of notability.--S Marshall /Cont 01:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Article claims of the number of staff and customers it has doesn't make it notable. Bidgee (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't get the objection to this article at all, then. Coverage in reliable sources is what makes something notable, and you agree in your nomination that Adam Internet has reliable sources. So what's the problem?--S Marshall /Cont 03:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep but more work is needed--Ret.Prof (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)