| Revision as of 22:22, 17 September 2005 editSon of Paddy's Ego (talk | contribs)733 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:52, 24 September 2005 edit undoGoodoldpolonius2 (talk | contribs)4,037 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| :As far as I can tell neither of them had references. If it's of any interest I'm actually trying to write a bot that will do this in an automated manner. Using MultiMap and the article name to get the data. I was simple doing a couple by hand to make sure I knew what was going on.--] 22:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC) | :As far as I can tell neither of them had references. If it's of any interest I'm actually trying to write a bot that will do this in an automated manner. Using MultiMap and the article name to get the data. I was simple doing a couple by hand to make sure I knew what was going on.--] 22:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Just noticed the maps, contain the info--] 22:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC). | :Just noticed the maps, contain the info--] 22:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC). | ||
| ==Laconia== | |||
| First of all, ] when editing, rather than accusing me of something. I removed the Laconia incident because it does not qualify as a massacre, and because it was added as one. I thought my edit summary was clear, and I apologize if it was not. As for the incident itself, it, like many ship sinkings, there is no reason to expect that this was a knowing massacre of civilians or POWs, which is what the page requires as a condition. The Laconia page itself makes it clear that there was no reason to suspect the Americans did not know anything about the POWs, and good reason to believe the order did not violate the rules of war in any case. Take a look at the rest of the massacres on the page -- do you really think it fits? Anyhow, I was not the only one to revert, and feel free to bring this up in the appropriate Talk page. --] 21:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 24 September 2005
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also Misplaced Pages:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!--File:Australia flag large.png Cyberjunkie 9 July 2005 03:30 (UTC)
Grid Refs
Rather than adding extra grid refs links to articles that already have them - eg. Kendal and Silverdale, Lancashire - would it not be better to add them to the hundreds of articles that do not have any grid references? -- RHaworth 10:56, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell neither of them had references. If it's of any interest I'm actually trying to write a bot that will do this in an automated manner. Using MultiMap and the article name to get the data. I was simple doing a couple by hand to make sure I knew what was going on.--Son of Paddy's Ego 22:21, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
- Just noticed the maps, contain the info--Son of Paddy's Ego 22:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC).
Laconia
First of all, assume good faith when editing, rather than accusing me of something. I removed the Laconia incident because it does not qualify as a massacre, and because it was added as one. I thought my edit summary was clear, and I apologize if it was not. As for the incident itself, it, like many ship sinkings, there is no reason to expect that this was a knowing massacre of civilians or POWs, which is what the page requires as a condition. The Laconia page itself makes it clear that there was no reason to suspect the Americans did not know anything about the POWs, and good reason to believe the order did not violate the rules of war in any case. Take a look at the rest of the massacres on the page -- do you really think it fits? Anyhow, I was not the only one to revert, and feel free to bring this up in the appropriate Talk page. --Goodoldpolonius2 21:52, 24 September 2005 (UTC)