| Revision as of 12:58, 27 September 2005 editPaul Klenk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,076 edits from Paul Klenk← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:14, 27 September 2005 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →from Paul KlenkNext edit → | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| ] ] 12:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC) | ] ] 12:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :In this case, I agree with Paul. Those comments are most appropriate for the talk page. ] - ] 16:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:14, 27 September 2005
Cindy Sheehan
Nice edits on Cindy Sheehan article. Badagnani 08:43, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Cindy Sheehan Technical Issue
Sorry for the comp problems on my end, I was just adding more anti-war mom comments, not vandalizing your work, which has been great. Just wanted to check in with that to avoid any confusion. Karmafist 23:27, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Cindy Sheehan
Don't revert any more of 4.228.90.146 edits to the summary; he'll be blocked shortly for 3RR violation and, in several hours, your can restore the summary. (That way you'll avoid 3RR yourself) Soltak 00:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Congrats
You definately deserve it, that article is great, and you've put in alot of work into it. For more info on Barnstars, the awards given to Wikipedians who do great things, check out WP:STAR.
Also, your user page is your own, unless you want it there, Keetoowah's comment can be removed immediately. His behavior has been atrocious, he currently has a request for comment out on him, i'll report his rude behavior to you there and to Zoe, an admin who's been checking on him. Karmafist 21:48, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
No Problem
No problem, just one more thing, usually it's customary to add 4 tildes like this,~~~~ at the end of a comment, so people know who wrote it without having to go to the history. Somebody should have said this when you first started, but the Welcoming Committee isn't able to get everybody. Karmafist 22:10, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Cindy Sheehan
Eleemosynary, Thanks for catching that. The jamboree reference could also have been labeled as POV since it's tangential to the Sheehan story. It's nice that Misplaced Pages is continually reviewed by others as its being created. Thanks again for helping. Kgrr 16:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
help
see the new arrival at Hurricane Katrina...
Vandal on the Air America Radio page
Hi there... I noticed that you were involved in many of the edits and discussions on the Air America Radio page and wondered if you might be able to help me deal with a vandal who is pushing a political POV agenda on that page. The vandal's name is Keetowah. I noticed from the AAR discussion page that previous contributors including yourself had significant trouble with this vandal. Any advice or assistance you may be able to provide would be much appreciated. --Pmagnay 15:43, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
Regarding Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_comment/BigDaddy777
Since you have begun interacting with Bigdaddy again , and endorsed the original RfC , I thought you might be interested to know that since the dispute resolution process has stalled due to BigDaddy's refusal to respond to this RfC, some are now questioning whether an RfAr should be filed. Your comments on this new issue would be appreciated. 69.121.133.154 20:23, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Harassing BigDaddy777
End it now. You've been warned. Big Daddy 05:54, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ooooooooo... I'm sooooooooooo scared. LOL! Eleemosynary 06:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- It is not Harassment to ask another user to respond to their RfC. In fact it is normal practice and has been done by several other users. But you ignored them all. Why is that? 69.121.133.154 06:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Let it go, dude...Big Daddy 06:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
from Paul Klenk
Hi, El,
I have noticed your comments in the section I am writing for BG's RfC. It is my understanding that each section is reserved for those presenting that view, and those who endorse the view, but not others. You will see some of those quote are used by others, on the talk page, to show BD's lack of improvement. I am using these quotes to demonstrate improved behavior; I have given my reasons in my summary that introduces them.
Hipocrite and I have discussed how the RfC should be formatted. I believe your comments in that particular section do not belong; you are welcome to create a section of your own, copy those quotes, and keep your comments with them; or, work with others to include your comments somewhere else. But I would like to ask you to please remove them from my section. If you have questions, please check with Hipocrite.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and thanks for contributing to the RfC.
Kind regards,
paul klenk 12:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- In this case, I agree with Paul. Those comments are most appropriate for the talk page. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:14, 27 September 2005 (UTC)