Revision as of 14:33, 4 November 2007 editBelovedfreak (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,904 edits updated wikiproject AfricaProject «Stub»← Previous edit |
Revision as of 01:50, 6 October 2008 edit undoNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits →Source for characterization as a "catamite"?: new sectionNext edit → |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{AfricaProject|class=Stub}} |
|
{{AfricaProject|class=Stub}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Source for characterization as a "catamite"? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. The quotation provided for Livy is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>"Hasdrubal, coming between father and son, held the supreme power for eight years. He is said to have become a favourite of Hamilcar's owing to his personal beauty as a boy; afterwards he displayed talents of a very different order, and became his son-in-law."</blockquote> |
|
|
|
|
|
While I agree that there's certainly an intimation there, isn't it quite a hop, skip, and a jump away from "He was a favourite because of his beauty" to "He was a boy who submitted to a sexual relationship with Hamilcar"? Are there other sources that say this more explicitly? It's perfectly appropriate for us to mention this if (for example) reputable historians have stated that this was what Livy meant. But I haven't found any substantiation for this claim -- outside of Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 01:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC) |
Hi. The quotation provided for Livy is as follows:
"Hasdrubal, coming between father and son, held the supreme power for eight years. He is said to have become a favourite of Hamilcar's owing to his personal beauty as a boy; afterwards he displayed talents of a very different order, and became his son-in-law."
While I agree that there's certainly an intimation there, isn't it quite a hop, skip, and a jump away from "He was a favourite because of his beauty" to "He was a boy who submitted to a sexual relationship with Hamilcar"? Are there other sources that say this more explicitly? It's perfectly appropriate for us to mention this if (for example) reputable historians have stated that this was what Livy meant. But I haven't found any substantiation for this claim -- outside of Misplaced Pages. Nandesuka (talk) 01:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)