| Revision as of 17:44, 29 September 2005 view source67.124.200.240 (talk) re-adding Maltmomma's changes← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 29 September 2005 view source 209.232.144.1 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| See ]. | |||
| ] Channel]] | |||
| '''Ann Hart Coulter''' (born ], ] in ]) is a prominent ] syndicated columnist, bestselling author, and television pundit. Her conservative commentary has earned her a reputation for strong criticism of social and political ]. Her speaking and writing style is provocative and aggressive, with heavy use of ]. | |||
| Coulter is the author of four political commentary books, all of which have been on the ]: | |||
| *'']'' (1998) | |||
| *'']'' (2002) | |||
| *'']'' (2003) | |||
| *'']'' (2004) | |||
| Coulter is a legal correspondent for the magazine '']'' and holds a degree in constitutional law. Her syndicated column for ] is carried by or linked to by many influential conservative websites, including ] and ]. Coulter was the subject of a ] cover story in ] ], and has made frequent guest appearances on national ] and syndicated ] programs. She has appeared on a large number of topical talk shows, including '']'', '']'', '']'' with ], '']'', '']'', ''Real Time'' with ], and '']'' with ]. Coulter has also appeared in '']'', a rebuttal of ]'s '']''. | |||
| ==Personal background== | |||
| Ann Coulter was born into a family that she has described as "upper middle class". She attributes her conservative opinions and her acerbic rhetorical style to her upbringing in ]. She has two elder brothers. Her father, John V. Coulter, was a lawyer, known for his legal work in cases against ]; he later became a constable. Her mother, Nell M. Coulter, is a member of the New Canaan Republican Town Committee. (Cloud, 2005) | |||
| As an undergraduate in ]'s College of Arts and Sciences, Ann Coulter helped to launch a conservative newspaper, The '']'', with funding provided by the Institute for Educational Affairs' ]. She graduated ] from Cornell in ], and went on to receive her ] from the ] Law School, where she was an editor of ''The Michigan Law Review''. At law school, Coulter shared an apartment with the human and civil rights advocate ] who is now the Legal Director for the ]. At Michigan, she founded a local chapter of the ]. She also received training at the National Journalism Center. After practicing ] for four years, she became a congressional aide in ] in ], working as a staffer to Republican Senator ], who served on the ] before working for a public interest law firm. | |||
| When asked if she is a ] ], Coulter told interviewer David Bowman, "I don't think I've described myself that way, but only because I'm from Connecticut. We just won't call ourselves that." (2003) Though she seldom argues from a religious point of view, Coulter has commented on leaders '']'' has labeled the "religious right", stating that ]'s support was overrated and that ] is ineffective and not conservative. (Slander, ch. 9) She commonly supports the positions of other Christian conservatives — although she argues that such a term often constitutes a liberal slur. When she received an award at the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute, she said she had become more Christian in recent years, and affirmed that "] died for my sins and I have eternal life", and that with such a faith liberals cannot hurt her. | |||
| ===Communication style=== | |||
| Coulter gained prominence in the field of ] commentators with her brand of outspoken criticism of many ] and ] figures and policies over the past half-century. She quickly established a reputation as a ] and colorful speaker, and indeed has relished this role (Coulter, August 2002). As she told '']'' in ], "I am a ]. I am perfectly frank about that. I like to stir up the pot. I don't pretend to be impartial or balanced, as broadcasters do." | |||
| Coulter has said she likes to read anything written by humorist ] (Coulter, January 2004), and she often employs comic techniques similar in style to his writings. | |||
| Ann Coulter is an especially frequent guest on the ]. She regularly appears on the ] program, and she is one of the few guests who seems to intimidate the notoriously aggressive O'Reilly. | |||
| ==Media career and relations with media outlets== | |||
| ] | |||
| In ], the fledgling television network ] hired Coulter as a legal correspondent and political pundit, launching her media career. Though she was allowed to make many partisan and controversial comments as a panelist, she was fired in ] after an exchange with ], president of the ], in which she said, "No wonder you guys lost" (MSNBC's NewsChat, October 11, 1997). | |||
| ===Relations with media outlets=== | |||
| When the editors of the '']'', the website of a well-known conservative magazine that carried Coulter's syndicated column and to which she was a contributing editor, wanted to discuss making changes to a piece written in 2001 directly after the ] in which her friend ] had been killed, Coulter went on the national television show '']'' and accused ''NRO'' of ], claiming her pay was only five dollars per article. '']'' then dropped her column and terminated her editorship. | |||
| ], ''NRO'' Editor, explained that, despite widely circulated media reports to the contrary, "We did not 'fire' Ann for what she wrote.... We ended the relationship because she behaved with a total lack of professionalism, friendship, and loyalty." | |||
| Ann Coulter was contracted by '']'' to cover the ], but was replaced by ] of the '']'' after a "disagreement over editing" (Memmot, 2004). Her one and only article from the convention began "Here at the Spawn of Satan convention in Boston", and referred to some female attendees as "corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie chick pie wagons". The newspaper did not print the article, but Coulter published it on her website. (Coulter, ] ]) | |||
| Coulter has been the subject of frequent protests, especially when speaking on college campuses. On one occasion, she had a pie thrown at her. | |||
| On 8/28/05, Coulter's syndicated column was dropped by the conservative newspaper "''Arizona Daily Star''" because, in the words of David Stoeffler, the publisher and editor of the Star, "We've decided that syndicated columnist Ann Coulter has worn out her welcome. Many readers find her shrill, bombastic and mean-spirited. And those are the words used by readers who identified themselves as conservatives." | |||
| Coulter has appeared several times on Bill Maher's program "''Politically Incorrect''". While on the show she compared actor ] to ] and said the constitutional amendment giving women the right to vote should be repealed. | |||
| ==Books== | |||
| In 1998, Coulter published '']'' as the first of several ] books targeting the left. As its title suggests, the book made a case for the impeachment of President ]. Written before the impeachment, Coulter criticizes the GOP-led Congress for not having yet impeached Clinton. | |||
| In 2002, Ann Coulter published '']'', a forthright critique of the alleged misconduct of liberals in American institutions. Like Bernard Goldberg's '']'', which came out the year before, ''Slander'' addressed ] in the United States, and went on to become a best-seller. | |||
| :''Slander'' claims that many American journalists have ties to the ] and are extremely liberal, which biases their reporting. Coulter argues that ] has faced a difficult and unfair battle for positive coverage in the media from the moment he decided to run for president, and that a similar battle for fair coverage has been waged by practically every ] presidential candidate since ]. | |||
| Her next book, '']'', claims that Democratic politicians and the media have severely undermined much of America's ] goals since the end of ], and that this is tantamount to conspiracy and treason. Summarizing recent history, she accuses Democratic presidents, including ] and ], of having sometimes worked against American interests in the ], and charges some Democratic members of Congress with similarly undermining the efforts of Republican presidents. In the final chapters, she argues that a comparable process is undermining the present ]. | |||
| ==Controversy== | |||
| ===Paula Jones controversy=== | |||
| Ann Coulter debuted as a figure on the public scene shortly before becoming an unpaid legal advisor working for the attorneys representing ] in her ] suit against ] ]. Coulter wrote a column about the Paula Jones case for the magazine ''Human Events''. Coulter's friend George Conway had been asked to assist Jones' attorneys, and shortly afterward Coulter was also asked to help; she began writing legal briefs for the case. | |||
| Coulter later stated that she would come to mistrust the motives of Paula Jones' head lawyer, Joseph Cammaratta, who told Jones that she didn't have a case and should take a settlement. (Daley, 1999) From the onset of the lawsuit, Jones had sought an apology from Clinton at least as eagerly as she sought a settlement (Barak, 1998), and in an interview Coulter said regarding herself that she had believed that Jones' case was solid, that she was telling the truth, that Clinton should be held publicly accountable for his misconduct, and that a settlement would give the impression that Jones was merely interested in extorting money from the President. (Daley, 1999) | |||
| David Daley who wrote the interview piece for the '']'' recounted what followed: | |||
| <blockquote>Coulter played one particularly key role in keeping the Jones case alive. In '']'' reporter ]'s new book ''Uncovering Clinton: A Reporter's Story'', Coulter is unmasked as the one who leaked word of Clinton's "distinguishing characteristic" -- his reportedly bent penis that Jones said she could recognize and describe -- to the news media. Her hope was to foster mistrust between the Clinton and Jones camps and forestall a settlement... </blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>I thought if I leaked the distinguishing characteristic it would show bad faith in negotiations. Bob Bennett would think Jones had leaked it. Cammaratta would know he himself hadn't leaked it and would get mad at Bennett. It might stall negotiations enough for me to get through to Susan Carpenter-McMillan to tell her that I thought settling would hurt Paula, that this would ruin her reputation, and that there were other lawyers working for her. Then 36 hours later, she returned my phone call. </blockquote> | |||
| <blockquote>I just wanted to help Paula. I really think Paula Jones is a hero. I don't think I could have taken the abuse she came under. She's this poor little country girl and she has the most powerful man she's ever met hitting on her sexually, then denying it and smearing her as president. And she never did anything tacky. It's not like she was going on TV or trying to make a buck out of it. (1999)</blockquote> | |||
| According to the Coulter Watch website, Coulter also told Isikoff, "We were terrified that Jones would settle. It was contrary to our purpose of bringing down the president." ("Oh, Paula", 2002, par. 5, 2) | |||
| The case eventually was brought to court after Jones had broken with Coulter and the rest of her original legal team, and it was summarily dismissed because the judge found that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages, even if her allegations proved true. Jones did gain a settlement, however, from Clinton in exchange for not appealing the decision, although at $850,000 it was only one-third of the amount she had been asking for and all but $151,000 went to pay her legal expenses. However, the Jones case eventually led to the ] and to the movement lobbying for Clinton's ], as Coulter had wished. Coulter made appearances on ] (a role which began before her legal involvement with Jones) in which she commented on the case, and went on to write a critical exposé of Clinton, boasting on '']'' that she "got a bestseller out of it" (''High Crimes and Misdemeanors'', which included a chapter on the lawsuit) and telling '']'' in August 1999, "The reason we were doing it for Paula–well, was for Paula. She had been defamed and I think we can say we got her reputation back." ("Oh, Paula", 2002, par. 8) | |||
| Jones (who had divorced her husband during the case, purchased a house after the settlement, and incurred a large tax bill) then posed nude for '']'', stating that she wished to use the money to pay the tax and fund her two grade-school-aged children's college education. Coulter publicly denounced her as "trailer-park trash", saying, "I totally believed she was the good Christian girl she made herself out to be.... ow it turns out she's a fraud, at least to the extent of pretending to be an honorable and moral person" ("Oh, Paula", 2002, par. 12). Jones defended herself in an interview with ] in October 2000, saying, "I haven't been offered a book deal like everybody else in this huge thing has done. Ann Coulter's done books. I haven't seen her call me up and say: 'Paula, would you like for me to help you write a book, a really nice, decent book?' I haven't had any help from anybody whatsoever." ("Oh, Paula", 2002, par. 14) | |||
| ===Canada and the Vietnam War=== | |||
| In ] ], Coulter gave an interview to ]'s ''The Fifth Estate'' () in which she argued that ]'s non-participation in the ] demonstrated that Canada's "loyal friendship" with the ] was weaker than in the past. She attempted to contrast the situation with the ], stating, "Canada used to be one of our most loyal friends and vice-versa. I mean Canada sent troops to Vietnam - was Vietnam less containable and more of a threat than Saddam Hussein?" The interviewer ] countered, "No, actually, Canada didn't send troops to Vietnam... Australia was there, not Canada." | |||
| Coulter asked if Canadian troops were sent to ], and again McKeown disagreed. Discussion continued in this vein with neither party conceding the other's point. | |||
| However, a ''Time Magazine'' article dated April 25, 2005, stated that "Canada did send noncombat troops to Indochina in the 1950s and again to Vietnam in 1972." (Canada sent officials to Vietnam in 1954 and 1973 as observers with the ].) Left-leaning media watchdog ] disputes this assertion, however, saying that writer ] was "making quite a stretch" to prove that Coulter wasn't inaccurate. They explain: "Canada was officially neutral during the Vietnam War, so if any noncombat troops were sent they would not have been sent to support U.S. forces there." FAIR also notes that Canadian troops are not mentioned "in a detailed 1975 U.S. Army history, Military historians, including ], have asserted that Canada's official neutrality is belied by its pro-US behavior during the war. | |||
| In a subsequent interview on ], Coulter stated that, while Canada did not send combat troops to Vietnam, thousands of Canadians had volunteered for the US military: | |||
| :''Yes, 10,000 Canadian troops, at least. There is a War Memorial to them, at least for most of that. The Canadian Government didn't send troops at the beginning, didn't send troops at the end, but most of that was not under the Canadian flag; they came and fought with the Americans. So I was wrong. It turns out there were 10,000 Americans who happened to be born in Canada...'' | |||
| :''I talked to him for three hours and the topic was not Canada's war history. It was an incidental point that he challenged me on, and I didn't believe him because I had read about Canadian troops in Vietnam. I was right. People keep saying, "well he didn't tell you that they - 10,000 troops - ran across to sign up with the Americans" because I don't think he knew. He's just a bubble head, Ted Baxter. He just talks to people for four hours and then comes in and chops it up, which is how liberals like to edit TV shows, and I think it is curious fact worth nothing.'' | |||
| ==Criticism== | |||
| Critics of Coulter frequently accuse her of ] and ]s, and argue that since she has such strong ] bias in her comments and writing she is willing to misrepresent sources and facts to support her case. This criticism mirrors the argument that she herself uses in her criticism of liberal left wing politicians, interest groups and the news media, particularly '']''. | |||
| Critics have taken issue with statements by Coulter regarding: Oklahoma City bomber ], President ], and Senator ], women's suffrage, women in the military, and women in the workplace, Muslims, juvenile delinquents, liberals, gun control, environmentalism, and ]. Coulter's supporters often suggest that the comments behind these views are taken out of context, that Coulter is only joking, or that she is engaging in hyperbole. However, Coulter herself has never stated that she doesn't hold these views when responding to the controversies about them. Indeed, when asked about a comment she made suggesting the New York Times building should be blown up, Coulter took the opportunity to clarify that she meant this should be done only with the newspaper staff inside. Supporters argue that she uses satire to illustrate her points and for intentional, if controversial, comic effect. However, some readers have been said to "find her shrill, bombastic and mean-spirited."{{ref|shrill}} | |||
| ] in '']'' that "Coulter may routinely call for the murder of liberals, of Arabs, of journalists, of the President, among many others." ] the McVeigh quote, along with Coulter's statement, "Would that it were so! ... That the American military were targeting journalists", in an article observing that Coulter has "again wished violence upon journalists". ] observes that | |||
| :''John Cloud's defense of Coulter's Tim McVeigh comment- "She said at the time that it was a joke-" is yet another contribution to his complete lack of any concern for fact-checking or objectivity in his ridiculous article.'' | |||
| :''Coulter had ample opportunity to acknowledge that her "joke" was tasteless, crude, and potentially endangering to the lives of several employees of the'' New York Times. ''Her response, instead, was made in an interview with the website Right Wing News, in which Coulter said, "Of course I regret it. I should have added, 'after everyone had left the building except the editors and reporters.'"'' | |||
| ===Allegations of Anti-Islamic Beliefs=== | |||
| Coulter has also drawn criticism for frequently making what some perceive to be anti-Islamic remarks, particularly against people of Middle Eastern descent. For instance, in an article published one day after the 9/11 attacks, she wrote "We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity". | |||
| A minor controversy ensued after Coulter denounced ], calling her an "old Arab" . In other instances, she has referred to the Middle East as a "swamp" and advocated racial profiling. | |||
| ===Al Franken=== | |||
| In his book '']'', ] claims that Coulter deliberately fabricates material and misrepresents the sources she cites. Two chapters of the book are devoted to criticizing Coulter and her book ''Slander'' where he accuses her of deliberately distorting facts.{{ref|Franken}} One way supporters counter the charge of misrepresentation is by pointing out that ''Slander'' contains 780 endnotes. ''The New York Times'' review of ''Slander'' praised Coulter's extensive citations, stating "A great deal of research supports Ms. Coulter's wisecracks." | |||
| Franken states that Coulter treats any comments found in '']'' as reflecting the official opinion of the newspaper, that she misrepresents facts about the ] among other subjects, and that she is hypocritical. | |||
| He further states that Coulter's statement (in ''Slander'', chapter 'The Joy of Arguing with Liberals: ''You're stupid''' ) that ''"If liberals were prevented from ever again calling Republicans dumb, they would be robbed of half their arguments...This is how six-year-olds argue: They call everything "stupid"'' can be viewed as hypocritical, because in the same book she describes prominent liberals (and moderate conservatives) as, "birdbrain", "dim-wit", "airhead", "boob", "a little dumb", "truly stupid", "half-wit", "D-U-M-M", and more. | |||
| ===Criticism of ''Treason'' and ''Slander''=== | |||
| '']'', which contains many strident accusations against all Liberals, brought her under fire, even from many conservatives (], for example). Many felt her claim was unfounded that Democrats such as Presidents ] and ] had worked against America's war on ]. ''Treason'''s defense of ] also came under criticism from both liberals and conservatives, who argued that Coulter had simply failed to accurately research the facts in her attempt to rehabilitate the controversial senator. In an interview with David Bowman, Coulter said that Joe McCarthy is the deceased person she admires the most. Coulter claims in ''Treason'' that McCarthy was simply misunderstood and unappreciated and that the ] have vindicated him, proving there indeed were Soviet spies in the ]. | |||
| An article in the ''Columbia Journalism Review'' criticised '']'', claiming it contained numerous "misstatements". In ''Slander'', Ann Coulter expounds the view that liberals are out of touch with America, and "have absolutely no contact with the society they decry from their ] redoubts." This echoed the sentiments of an ] ] '']'' article, in which Ann Coulter argued that the media are biased to the left because Republicans don't have the wealth to start media outlets, while Democrats do. That Republicans are rich, she said, "is one of the stunning lies that Democrats have been able to palm off... Liberals really are the idle rich." | |||
| ], the author of ''Big Lies'', accuses Coulter of double standards, arguing that she is a highly-educated, affluent woman with a high-profile media presence who does not similarly accuse herself, or other privileged Republicans, of being out of touch. | |||
| ==Quotations== | |||
| <!-- Please do not add any more quotes. See the talk page before adding anything new to this section. Feel free to add quotes to WikiQuote --> | |||
| The following quotes are examples of Ann Coulter's flamboyant and often inflammatory ] style, for which she is well-known. | |||
| Many view these quotes as examples of a tongue-in-cheek use of ] or ], while others take them more seriously. Coulter herself once stated, "Liberals love to pretend they don't understand hyperbole." However, she has also stated, "I believe everything I say." | |||
| {{wikiquote}} | |||
| *"''The ethic of conservation is the explicit abnegation of man's dominion over the Earth. The lower species are here for our use. God said so: Go forth, be fruitful, multiply, and rape the planet -- it's yours. That's our job: drilling, mining and stripping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars -- that's the Biblical view''." <!--from her column ''Oil Good, Democrats Bad'', October 2000--> | |||
| *''"We know who the homicidal maniacs are. They are the ones cheering and dancing right now. We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only ] and his top officers. We ] German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war."'' - on the 9/11/01 attacks, From her syndicated column ], ] | |||
| *''"I have to say I'm all for public flogging. One type of criminal that a ] might work particularly well with are the ]s, a lot of whom consider it a badge of honor to be sent to juvenile detention. And it might not be such a cool thing in the 'hood to be flogged publicly."'' - MSNBC ], ] | |||
| *''"It would be a much better country if women did not vote. That is simply a fact. In fact, in every presidential election since ] - except ] in ] - the Republican would have won, if only the men had voted."'' - ], ] | |||
| * ''"Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now."'' - (from Slander, pp. 5-6; published June 2002) | |||
| *''"The ''Times'' was rushing to assure its readers that 'prominent Islamic scholars and theologians in the West say unequivocally that nothing in Islam countenances the Sept. 11 actions.' (That's if you set aside Muhammad's many specific instructions to kill nonbelievers whenever possible)"'' - ''How to Talk to a Liberal'', 2004. | |||
| For more quotations from Ann Coulter, see her Wikiquote page. | |||
| ==References== | |||
| *Barak, Daphne (September 23, 1998). . ''Irish Examiner''. | |||
| *Bowman, David (July 25, 2003). . ''salon.com'' . | |||
| *Cloud, John (April 25, 2005). "Ms. Right." ''Time''. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (October 30, 2000). . ''Jewish World Review''. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (July 18, 2002). . ''Jewish World Review''. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (July 18, 2002). . Interview with Phil Donahue. Free Republic. posted by Pistolshot, July 19, 2002. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (August 26, 2002). . Interview with George Gurley. ''New York Observer'' reprinted at AntiAuthority. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (October 9, 2003). . ''Jewish World Review''. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (January 12, 2004). . Interview with Jamie Glazov. ''FrontPageMag.com''. | |||
| *Coulter, Ann (July 26, 2004). . ''anncoulter.com''. | |||
| *Daley, David (June 25, 1999). . ''Hartford Courant''. | |||
| *{{note|Franken}}{{Book reference | Author=Franken, Al | Title=] | Publisher =Dutton Books| Year=2003 | ID=ISBN 0525947647}} | |||
| *] (October 3, 2001). . ''National Review Online''. | |||
| *Memmot, Mark (July 26, 2004). . ''USAToday.com''. Updated July 27, 2004. | |||
| *{{note|shrill}}{{Citenewsauthor | surname=Stoeffler | given=David | title=Opinion pages get a makeover | date=] | org=Arizona Daily Star | url=http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/opinion/90500.php}} | |||
| * (.pdf file) (2002). Coulterwatch.com. Retrieved March 17, 2005. | |||
| *West, Nigel (2000). ''Venona: The Greatest Secret of the Cold War''. London: HarperCollins. ISBN 0006530710 | |||
| ==Books by Ann Coulter== | |||
| *'']: The World According to Ann Coulter'' (Crown Forum, 2004) ISBN 1400054184. The book is a collection of columns on varied topics, such as ], the U.S. ] and the ]. | |||
| *'']'' (Crown Forum, 2003) ISBN 1400050308 | |||
| *''Feminist Fantasies'' by ], foreword by Ann Coulter (Spence Publishing, 2003) ISBN 1890626465 | |||
| *'']'' (Crown Forum, 2002) ISBN 1400046610 | |||
| *'']'' (Regnery Publishing, 1998) ISBN 0895261138 | |||
| *'''', ]documentary on Ann Coulter containing a clip of her interviews and speeches, released in ]. | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| ;Articles | |||
| * ''anncoulter.com''. | |||
| * - collection of syndicated columns on ''Jewish World Review''. | |||
| ;Biography and quotes | |||
| *. | |||
| *. | |||
| * by mostly critical editors. | |||
| * documentary on Coulter. | |||
| *. | |||
| *. | |||
| ;Book Reviews | |||
| *"Limerick, Dr. Rush" (September 9, 2002). . Rev. of ''Slander''. ''slannder.homestead.com''. Looks at chapter 2. | |||
| *] (Winter 2003). . Rev. of ''Treason''. ''Claremont Review of Books'' . by biographer of Joseph McCarthy. | |||
| *] (July 8, 2003). . Rev. of ''Treason''. ''Frontpagemag.com''. Article by a conservative both critical and praising. | |||
| *Nyhan, Brendan (June 30, 2003). . Rev. of ''Treason''. ''spinsanity''. Media analyst protests "complicated set of rhetorical tricks." | |||
| ;Criticism | |||
| * | |||
| *] (September 5, 2002). . ''The Nation''. criticism of Coulter | |||
| * | |||
| * by Jack Clark | |||
| * former "watch site" for Ann Coulter, now seldom updated. | |||
| * another defunct watch site. | |||
| *{{book reference| | |||
| Title=The I Hate Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity...Reader: The Hideous Truth About America's Ugliest Conservatives| | |||
| Author=Willis, Clint| | |||
| Year=2004| | |||
| Publisher=Thunder's Mouth Press| | |||
| ID=ISBN 1560256141| | |||
| }} | |||
| ;Current events (fan sites and watch sites) | |||
| * Discussion of Coulter's books and columns, as well as political debate and dialogue on current events. | |||
| * not currently maintained, contains archive. | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * Organization in opposition to Ann Coulter's exploits | |||
| ;Interviews | |||
| * (June 26, 2002) Interview with Katie Couric. NBC. ''Today''. Reprinted at ''Drudge Report Archive.'' | |||
| * (], ]) Interview with Brian Lamb. C-Span. ''Booknotes''. Reprinted at ''Booknotes.org.'' | |||
| * (], ]) Interview with Chris Matthews. MSNBC. ''Hardball with Chris Matthews.'' Reprinted at ''the Rational Radical.'' | |||
| ;News features | |||
| *Leiby, Richard (], ]). . ''washingtonpost.com''. | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 19:34, 29 September 2005
See Satan.