| Revision as of 06:35, 12 August 2005 editEc5618 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,906 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:58, 29 September 2005 edit undoSwmeyer (talk | contribs)99 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| * Add references. Many references. | * Add references. Many references. | ||
| * Re-visit the suggestion that "Creationism" refers to any and all theories that the universe was created ex nihilo by a deity, as opposed, more specifically, to the assertion that it was created in six twenty-four hour days, literally and as to every detail as described in Genesis 1. See ]. | * Re-visit the suggestion that "Creationism" refers to any and all theories that the universe was created ex nihilo by a deity, as opposed, more specifically, to the assertion that it was created in six twenty-four hour days, literally and as to every detail as described in Genesis 1. See ]. | ||
| * Whether Intelligent Design (ID) should be considered Creationism is questionable. As a theory, ID is intended to simply detect design among biological information. The philosophy behind it and the nature of the source of intelligence(s) is beyond the scope of ID. | |||
Revision as of 22:58, 29 September 2005
- Add section on the differences/similarities/conflict between Intelligent Design and Creationism
- Add references. Many references.
- Re-visit the suggestion that "Creationism" refers to any and all theories that the universe was created ex nihilo by a deity, as opposed, more specifically, to the assertion that it was created in six twenty-four hour days, literally and as to every detail as described in Genesis 1. See Creation according to Genesis.
- Whether Intelligent Design (ID) should be considered Creationism is questionable. As a theory, ID is intended to simply detect design among biological information. The philosophy behind it and the nature of the source of intelligence(s) is beyond the scope of ID.