| Revision as of 09:42, 11 May 2008 editShoemaker's Holiday (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,613 edits →Pseudoscience: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:05, 8 October 2008 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits rem redirect, I think this needs its own discussion page.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| == Pseudoscience == | == Pseudoscience == | ||
Revision as of 04:05, 8 October 2008
Pseudoscience
I've restored a comment that was in the faq from at least 2004 to about late 2007, when it got removed in a text cleanup. I think it clarifies the scope of the Pseudoscience section in a way that the revised, 2008 wording does not. To whit, "The task before us is not to describe disputes as though, for example, pseudoscience were on a par with science." Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 09:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)